English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For example, Byrd in the KKK and Bill & Monica.

Is that where the term beating a dead horse comes from?

2006-06-14 05:33:32 · 17 answers · asked by Pitchow! 7 in Politics & Government Politics

Oh, my bad. I thought 9/11 was bad. Oops. I guess the same could be said about thousands of troops dying for nothing. Thank you for enlightening me, jm.

2006-06-14 05:38:06 · update #1

bob t-Yale undergrad and Stanford MBA here. Now you have.

2006-06-14 07:15:18 · update #2

17 answers

You know, we Republicans could say the same thing. The liberals, or as I like to call them, the Socialist Party of America, likes to bring up Vietnam everytime we turn around. Or like your "Got oil?" picture. If he was after oil, do you think prices would be so high right now? He would be shipping it out of there so fast, it would make their heads spin. No. All the Socialists can say is that we are after oil? What about the thousands who died under Hussien's rigime? And now they are trying to dig up dirt on our military members caught in the middle of a firefight after their vihicle blew up and their buddy they went through basic is dead, roasting in the burning vehicle they had to get out of, and you want to whine about them killing a few civilians who unexpectedly charged into the middle of it? You put yourself in the middle of all that, and then tell me about it. War is Hel#, and if your gonna win, you have to be willing to take the risk to stay alive. If all you can offer our troops is slander about our Commander in Cheif, think about how moral of the troops is. And Byrd? KKK? True, but he's one of the Socialist heroes. And Bill? He lied to the nation. He lost all trust. Has bush flat out lied? No. He has acted on what the security council has told him. You put yourself in that chair, and listen to a board of directors, military men, and other people, and the only thing you know is what they are feeding you, and when their stories match up, thats what you have to go on. Also think about what is good for the people, not only of your party, not only of your country, but the good of the world community. So, "Dead horse"? The liberals do the same thing, comparing this war to Vietnam. And other instances. Here's why Vietnam fell apart. The nation lost all faith in the troops. The troops heard this and their moral took a plumet. They lost all will to fight. But I still beleive. God Bless America and Her Troops!! Thank you.

2006-06-14 06:13:07 · answer #1 · answered by Randall M 2 · 7 5

Maybe because folks like you would rewrite history. The problem is you ignore it, and your party continues to run on the same ideas election after election and loses. Why not try some positive outreach to get people to join you. Your party moves left forgetting the middle. Why not offer sensible alternatives.You are not and I doubt you ever will
based on your Tenor. Have you ever opposed your leadership? I have with mine. I remember history well and look to the future in a positive manner. History is written to the benefit of the winners. In my opinion will you just be an asterisk or are you going to do something?

2006-06-14 12:56:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nothing bad has happened since Bill left office.

Betcha didn't see that one coming.

YEP, I knew you wouldn't be able to let that go. Your question isn't serious so neither was my answer. Relax. And Jim W, "hatemonger"? Have you failed to notice the pointed nature of this very question posted here? I think YEP is victimizing me with a hate crime. I'd better call the ACLU.

2006-06-14 12:35:17 · answer #3 · answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5 · 0 0

I didn't know we were trying to whine.

I was under the impression the country is being run pretty good right now.

Isn't it the liberals job to whine? Speaking of which, are they still using that tired old, whiny argument 'war for oil', and 'bush lied', even though they have been disproved?

2006-06-14 13:50:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hell they still bring up Ted Kennedy's accident 40 years later. I think what we got here is we are dealing with pond scum, you know one celled animals with no brain. They still buy we went into Iraq because of the WMD'S. I think the ones that are left are probably the more mentally diminished of the American people. That has to be the explanation.

2006-06-14 12:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cause thats all they got. Isn't it funny? Their choice is going into the toilet and it's "Oh look what Clinton did" Clinton got slapped for what he did, get over it. It going to be along time before this country and others get over the damage that little twerp in Washington has done.

2006-06-14 13:19:58 · answer #6 · answered by sassyk 5 · 0 0

Because they have NOTHING to argue FOR, so they have to speak against LONG PASSED issues as a defense mechanism. It's funny really, seeing them talk about Bill and Monica as if it was current. You never hear them talk about the quagmire or deficit or increased terrorism because they can't admit it to themselves, they are HYPOCRITES!

2006-06-14 13:03:13 · answer #7 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 0 0

You have to understand history.
WHAT SENATOR JOHN GLENN SAID:
>
> There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in
> January.
> In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in
> the month of January.That's just one American city,
> about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of
> Iraq.
>
>
> When some claim that President Bush shouldn't
> have started this war, state the following:
>
>
> a. FDR led us into World War II.
>
> b. Germany never attacked us; Japan did.
> From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...
> an average of 112,500 per year.
>
> c. Truman finished that war and started one in
> Korea. North Korea never attacked us.
> From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...
> an average of 18,334 per year.
>
> d John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in
> 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
>
> e. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.
> From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ..
> an average of 5,800 per year.
>
> f. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or
> French consent. Bosnia never attacked us.
> He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
> three times by Sudan and did nothing Osama has
> attacked us on multiple occasions.
>
> g. In the years since terrorists attacked us ,
> President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed
> the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear
> inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea without
> firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who
> slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
>
>
> The Democrats are complaining about how long the war
> is taking.
> But
> - It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet
> Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound.
> That was a 51-day operation.
>
>
> We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons
> in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton
> to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
>
>
> It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and
> the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard
> than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after
> his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick
>
>
> It took less time to take Iraq than it took
> to count the votes in Florida!!!!
>
> Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a GREAT JOB!
> The Military morale is high!
>
> The biased media hopes we are too ignorant
> to realize the facts -
>
>
> But Wait there's more!
>
> JOHN GLENN (ON THE SENATE FLOOR)
> Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:13
>
>
> Some people still don't understand why military
> personnel do what they do for a living. This
> exchange between Senators John Glenn and Senator
> Howard Metzenbaum is worth reading.
> Not only is it a pretty impressive impromptu speech,
> but it's also a good example of one
> man's explanation of why men and women in the armed
> services do what they do for a living
>
>
> This IS a typical, though sad, example of what
> some who have never served think of the military.
>
> Senator Metzenbaum (speaking to Senator Glenn):
> "How can you run for Senate when you've never held a
> real job?"
>
> Senator Glenn (D-Ohio):
> "I served 23 years in the United States Marine
> Corps. I served through two wars. I flew 149
> missions. My plane was hit by anti-aircraft fire on
> 12 different occasions. I was in the space program.
> It wasn't my checkbook, Howard; it was my life on
> the line. It was not a nine-to-five job, where I
> took time off to take the daily cash receipts to the
> bank."
>
>
> "I ask you to go with me ... as I went the other
> day... to a veteran's hospital and look those men
> .. with their mangled bodies in the eye, and tell
> THEM they didn't hold a job!
>
> You go with me to the Space Program at NASA
> and go, as I have gone, to the widows and Orphans
> of Ed White, Gus Grissom and Roger Chaffee...
> and you look those kids in the eye and tell them
> that their DADS didn't hold a job.
>
> You go with me on Memorial Day and you stand in
> Arlington National Cemetery, where I have more
> friends buried than I'd like to remember, and you
> watch those waving flags
>
>
> You stand there, and you think about this nation,
> and you tell ME that those people didn't have a job?
>
>
> What about you?"
>
> For those who don't remember During WW.II, Howard
> Metzenbaum was an attorney
> representing the Communist Party in the USA.
>
> Now he's a Senator!
>
>
> If you can read this, thank a teacher.
> If you are reading it in English thank a Veteran.
>
>
>
> It might not be a bad idea to keep this circulating.
>
> God Bless America!!

2006-06-14 13:27:01 · answer #8 · answered by HEATHER 4 · 0 0

Whine?

isn't that the only thing that liberals do

if more of them had high school diplomas

there wouldn't be a problem

.

2006-06-14 13:52:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What has happened recently to whine about? that is the true question

2006-06-14 12:43:05 · answer #10 · answered by Football rules 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers