I loved him as the bad guy tag team parter with Jim the Anvil. One of the best finishing moves around. Hate him as a solo wrestler. Agree?
2006-06-14 03:54:14 · 9 answers · asked by rocco 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Solo, he became one of the greatest wrestlers of all time. Never would of happened if he stayed in a tag team.
Same goes for Shawn Michaels and the Rockers.
Don't get me wrong I loved the Hart Foundation and the Rockers, but we never would of got all of the classic Bret vs HBK matches we did, including the first ever Ironman match and of course the Survivor Series screwjob, and some may not know this but they also put on the first ever ladder match back in 1992.
2006-06-14 06:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a Tag Team the Hart Foundation, in my opinion are the greatest Tag Team. As a solo wrestler Bret Hart is #3 on my list of greatest wrestlers. So I guess it didn't matter he's always been one of the best.
2006-06-14 06:30:25 · answer #2 · answered by GR8 ONE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOPE. Bret Hart was better as a SOLO wrestler. his fame spread when he became solo. He won the Intercontinental championship on two occassions when he became solo, and won WWE championship 5 times, Royal Rumble winner, King Of The Ring 1993. 2 times WCW champion, 4 times wcw U.S Champion. His career catapulted only after being solo wrestler.
2006-06-14 08:15:44 · answer #3 · answered by onedeepen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't bad as a solo but I did prefer him in the Hart Foundation. I agree that the finishing move was awesome. It was similar to the doomsday device from The Road Warriors but I felt it was more realistic.
2006-06-14 05:06:22 · answer #4 · answered by elric1970 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, disagree. He was the greatest WWF champ of all time. Remember his matches with HBK, Kurt Henning, Bob Backlund, & Steve Austin just to name a few. The Anvil was a boring wrestler with a weird personality and his wrestling ability was limited.
2006-06-14 04:02:10 · answer #5 · answered by Chris L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bret hart , ric flair is a jealous, bitter, previous basturd who maintains to trash Bret affirming he isn't any one because he under no circumstances wrestled some previous adult males from the 70's. hello flair Bret isn't as previous as you so he couldn't attempt adversarial to all those previous adult males and a minimum of Bret is familiar with at the same time as to retire. This overvalued piece of garbage thinks triumphing 16 belts by skill of butt kissing each and each booker and under no circumstances retiring makes you tremendous. i'm able to't wait to take heed to Bret's reaction. a minimum of at the same time as Bret replaced into promoting out madison sq. backyard , flair replaced into wrestling in the front of chairs, that is why Bret Hart has money and flair is broke.
2016-10-30 21:15:44 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bret was better as a singles worker. At the time he was a tag team worker, he was VERY quick and extremely technical. He REALLY was the BEST at that time. In the 90's when the WWE took on their "attitude" persona to compete with WCW and ECW, Bret was not willing to change with the times and found himself losing popularity. I DO disagree with you though, as far as technical style and straight toughness...Bret WAS one of the BEST champions ever.
2006-06-14 05:28:02 · answer #7 · answered by cottonmouthwolf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The British Bulldogs-HF fued had some of the best matches, so much so that Hogan-jabronie actually wrestled BEFORE this match on cards. Still, his best matches were as a singles wrestler.
2006-06-14 04:00:11 · answer #8 · answered by DR 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agree, him and the Anvil were great together, i lost interest in him after he went solo.
2006-06-14 03:57:47 · answer #9 · answered by PortReplicator 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋