You're right, she would be more attractive as a raisin.
2006-06-14 01:04:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't suppose that she's any more biased than, say, Michael Moore. However, their styles are radically different. Michael Moore uses facts, reason, and humor to back up his arguments. Instead of merely backing up her arguments with facts or reason, Ann Coulter resorts to name-calling and insults. But then again, I don't think that Ann Coulter is trying to convert anyone. She's simply preaching to the choir. If anything, maybe we should be thankful that she exists, because she serves as living proof that the Republican Party is full of nutcases who are completely lacking in compassion and who have never lived in the real world. Plus, she gives us something to laugh at!:)
2006-06-14 06:22:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by tangerine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree with her actions and beliefs 110% but I do respect her as an intelligent woman. Twisted but intelligent.
I really don't know what in the heck she is thinking to go as far as she did this time. I mean she has always been very bold and claims she is proud to say outloud some of the things that a lot of the far right are afraid to say.
BUT, this time she really crossed the line. I mean not only is there absolutely no truth in any of what she said, she also just renewed the public's old view of the republican party as the party of cruel-hearted ppl that have no compassion at all for ppl who have sufferred.
2006-06-14 00:47:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, right...You met her. Your initial premise is obviously a lie, so the question is faulty right out of the gate. You don't know her, and I doubt you have really read anything she has said. You base your stupid question on media hype and statements taken out of context.
Coulter's style is obviously outrageous...but outrageous for a reason. It gets people's attention and makes them think (at least most people...maybe not you) about their stand on issues. It's kind of a "shock therapy" to break people away from today's mind-numbing politically correct thought police. If something is PC, people don't dare question it anymore.
That's evil...not Coulter.
2006-06-14 03:21:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like a raisin in the sun
or a decomposing piece of grass
or a worm on a hot plate
or a discarded vase of daisies
or an exposed jar of hair gel
or a petrified forest
or an overheated fuel tank
that just implodes because of its
asinine misplacement and combustible
nature, yes. Anti-christ comes to mind
when I see that lady. I think she's Satan's
latest model. He worked on that one a LooonG tiiime!
2006-06-14 00:47:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sleek 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Did anyone in this little lynch mob read the book? Or are you just forming a posse and going out for a hanging party? Oh, your basing this all on the most trust worthy media of the NY Times or the unbalanced Fox News...so now I have to go buy the book and read it just see if she is a screaming banshee or just someone that ticks off liberals.
2006-06-14 08:27:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't because I'm not cruel to think those things. Why is it so hard to understand what Ann meant? I knew what she meant. I was mad at those widows for a long time. But we can't get mad at them for calling my President names because they are suffering. She was only talking about 4 widows. Does Al frankin speak for the democrats....when he calls for the execution of the president .....how about churchill...when he called, calls the victims of 9/11 little eichmens...do they represent the democratic party ?? this man and his rhetoric are hysteria, no more no less.
How about a link to some of what Ann is talking about in 2003, or 2004. She is a republican and has a right to be mad.
2006-06-14 01:23:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ann Coulter is a sturdy public speaker and is an entertainer. She isn't stupid in spite of what you people trust. the component that bothers you each and each of the most is her serious assaults adversarial to left-wing democrats is sensible. Your social gathering continuously stands with the terrorists affirming: "we are dropping the warfare, it truly is an unlawful warfare, the infantrymen are killing women people and little ones" those are verbatim prices from from democrats AND the terrorists. You tell me who's the most traitorous? Your social gathering needs to grant terrorists get top of entry to to our legal gadget... for an act of warfare adversarial to the U. S.. Your social gathering is only about with out exception 2 confronted, they vote for and then say they were adversarial to the warfare.
2016-10-30 21:07:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean she hasn't already? I've been assuming that she's undead.
Seriously, we shouldn't be too hard on her. There's nothing wrong with Ann Coulter that a plate of pork chops and a good lay couldn't fix.
2006-06-14 00:58:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by marbledog 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like to hear her. She may be the only living brain donor! She will shrivel up and die eventually, like it or not we all will. No question about that!
Sometimes I think the dislike she generates is a result of the envy of the left. They wish they had such a great bullshit/propaganda machine!
Vote them all out, every one of them, and see things change!
2006-06-14 00:48:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by john f 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Die, eh, I dunno about that. Personally, I'd much rather see her suffer, well, I can't say alive and well. Cause while she's still alive, she won't be doin' so well. Just wait, she'll show up at the Faux News room with fresh bruises, bloodshot eyes and a swollen lip, courtesy the 9/11 widows or the left-wing women that respect what Susan B. Anthony fought for.
2006-06-14 00:57:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by The Phenomenal One 2
·
1⤊
0⤋