i hope not. it would screw small busness who get charged a standerd rate for card charges. pluss how would you pay taxi drivers? or the plumber who tightens a nut and call it £3 for the petrol.
2006-06-14 00:19:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by drunkredneck45 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not! It would be another brick in the edifice propounded by Blunkett, Clarke, Reid and Blair: the database state.
I already have the Royal Bank Switch card. I think all their customers in Scotland have the same sort of card. That can be used for any transaction however small.
My concern is that a transaction with Switch is traceable back to the owner of the card, whereas cash is untraceable. Over the years since about 1500 the Banks have expended enough effort to fill a small museum (which stands at the top of the Mound in Edinburgh) on efforts to make banknotes and currency trustworthy. As long as it is very hard to forge a bank note, the seller can trust the currency rather than the customer. That sounds like a trivial distinction but actually it's really important. It means that the seller can verify payment without knowing who the customer is.
Using Switch involves a dramatic loss of privacy. That's why you can't buy a mobile phone with cash in the UK: the government wants to be able to trace your calls. (It's also why you can't buy or use an encrypted mobile phone at all: the government wants to listen to your calls and read your texts.) And you can't buy an anonymous swipe card with cash: all such cards can be traced back to you.
Once records of everything you buy are being made up by the banks, you can be certain that the government will obtain copies of them (as they already do with records of the Internet sites you visit and the emails you send.) The threat to basic privacy, to do whatever legal thing you wish without anyone else finding out, will be greatly reduced. If you don't think these records will be abused, try counting the number of nuisance phone calls you get as a result of the abuse of the telephone directory, which publishes only the least intimate of personal data about you.
If cash is actually abolished it also means, incidentally, that small traders will need to buy and operate expensive equipment and open expensive accounts, which will give big corporate business yet another advantage over the small traders whom they hate and fear.
2006-06-14 00:39:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way, whats happens if there is a power cut??? A bit simplistic maybe but it would bring a standstill to whole towns!
I'm all for making life simpler but look at this chip & pin thing and the fraud that is happening there.
I own a small business and credit card machines are expensive and if we inadverdantly accept a fraudulent transaction we have to cover the costs and there is already enough of that going on without adding more methods!
2006-06-15 00:04:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm all for developing technology and systems, and anything that brings us closer to a society without an economy. But I don't think we are ready for this yet.
How can we donate loose change to charity, and what am I supposed to use as ammo on those pesky pigeons?
2006-06-14 00:33:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by xenobyte72 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm all for the swipe cards! Vending machines, drive throughs, gas and now McDonalds.
No more fumbling for cash and change.
2006-06-14 00:19:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rhonda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine some people ought to no longer function interior of a framework of non-public freedom and responsibility or with out probability of eternal damnation for undesirable habit, so for some it would not be probability-free to "get rid" of religion altogether. i love that folk can freely pick and teach their non secular beliefs in my way of existence. i opt to understand who're the loose thinkers in the inhabitants and who're the superstitious people, so i understand what i'm able to anticipate from them. I mean once you spot one in each of those fish symbols on a vehicle, do not you only keep in mind that they received't speed, received't decrease you off, received't replace lanes with out signaling? lol! those classic such issues as rituals, funerals, celebrations and the knowledge to attend to loss, suffering and such are area of psychology commonplace, no longer the only province of religion. people often choose those classic issues, and many thousands and thousands people are able to operate on a really intense and pleasing psychological aspect with out infusing our rituals with non secular overtones. wish that answer helps shed some gentle for you. playstation Believers are happier than athiests, besides the indisputable fact that that is because athiests face the data, at the same time as believers placed on blinders.
2016-10-30 21:07:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how would we change the entire structure of penny anty giving to the needy and pay the higher prices that vendors will pay to change to electronic money card system, and workers that rely on tips and money exchanges. hard enough for some to live now! to make this drastic change has dire consequences, bad idea!
2006-06-14 00:23:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by sorrells316 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way, how on earth are the working class going to survive without the black economy to fall back on?
2006-06-14 00:20:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Uncle Sid 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will eventually happen, the question is when will currency be eliminated completely. It won't be next year but it will be done before a hundred years passes.
2006-06-14 00:32:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by MancalledDad 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, coinage is obsolete now
2006-06-14 00:19:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jeff J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋