2006-06-13 21:22:09 · 13 answers · asked by sonu 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In my opinion the search for Bin Laden was justifiable after the tower attacks. But going into Iraq to so called free the country and derstroy the weopons of mass destruction was bullshit. The only reason we are in Iraq is for the oil. Our occupation of Iraq should have been over a long time ago. And increasing the budget to continue where we no longer belong is also bullshit. Bush is running the country into the ground, why don't we take care of our own country first before everyone else's. We have people starving and living in the streets and he takes 8 billion dollars to keep our friends and family fighting his own personal war that his father didn't finish. It is time for him to go! We need someone who will take care of his own first.
2006-06-13 21:37:48 · answer #1 · answered by danjr101n 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
War is hell. Let's be absolutely clear- Bush was not responsible for 9/11- regardless of what conspiracy theorists may claim.
He did not start this round. Of course, you can blame years of schitzophrenic American foreign policy, but don't blame Bush for the War.
The argument that just because Saddam Hussein wasn't caught red handed with WMD's in his pants doesn't lessen the danger he represented (and still represents).
Could the war have been fought better? Yes! Should so many troops have been killed - no! But the world is in the middle of a cultural war and until it is resolved strength in the face of evil is vital.
Sixty years ago Europe blinked in the face of terror and we had the Second World War in which millions died. For the sake of the world, here's hoping the US stays strong.
2006-06-14 09:28:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you believe that the war is justified, no. If you don't, then I'm not sure what the answer to that question is, because I don't know if he could gain moral ground after being responsible for the unjustified death of thousands.
2006-06-14 04:27:06 · answer #3 · answered by anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.No. He should have not gotten elected because he is an idiot who got us into Iraq and Afghanistan on immoral grounds.
He isn't going to resign and we just have to get over it.
2006-06-14 04:27:38 · answer #4 · answered by Roseknows 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush may be a jerk but he doesn't have to resign and we don't have the votes to Impeach him so just vote Democratic in the elections.
2006-06-14 04:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by John Luke 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He will be out of office January 20th 2009 anyways
2006-06-14 04:25:52 · answer #6 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! People die! They died in the french revolution...They died in the Russian revolution...They died in the American revolution...people died when Castro took over Cuba...ect........You CANNOT MAKE AN OMLETTE WITHOUT BREAKING EGGS!
2006-06-14 04:30:02 · answer #7 · answered by shehandvj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't. But it is apparent that you do if you started this question with "don't you" which indicates you are just looking for someone to agree with what you already think.
2006-06-14 04:47:14 · answer #8 · answered by casey54 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Resign!!! He should be put in jail
2006-06-14 04:38:39 · answer #9 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry I never think such question before
2006-06-14 04:26:05 · answer #10 · answered by Dark Angel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋