2006-06-13 21:12:42 · 5 answers · asked by KghC_thegreatest 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Even one has no intetion to commit crime, one's action may harm others. Ignorant actions should be punished in some ways to prevent/remind people from not doing so. You can't accidentally kill someone and say "oops i'm sorry" right? The law is to remind people try NOT to harm others (and help them too).
2006-06-13 21:20:14 · answer #1 · answered by plasmaisnoturs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there was no intent to commit a crime, yet a crime was still committed then yes there would still be an arrest - but with a lesser penalty - than if there was an intent. A crime is still a crime if you do the wrong thing expect to be punished.
2006-06-14 04:19:29 · answer #2 · answered by Mintjulip 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who, what, crime? I swear the goats where bloody when i got there.
2006-06-14 04:17:25 · answer #3 · answered by chupakabra123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wrong, not intending to commit a crime does not equal no crime.
The judge will lenient if he believe you if it goes to court
2006-06-14 04:14:47 · answer #4 · answered by jsbrads 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
possibly, if anyone knwe what you were talking about!
2006-06-14 04:15:13 · answer #5 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋