English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OIL consumption, Global Warming, Pollution,

2006-06-13 17:02:51 · 7 answers · asked by gg 1 in Science & Mathematics Physics

7 answers

Yes, and all our environmental problems. At nuclear fusion temperatures you could make a fusion torch that would decompose waste into useful raw materials and transmute radioactive waste into stable elements. A fusion reactor isn't likely to be small enough to power cars or aircraft, but the cheap energy it produces could be used to synthesise fuels for these vehicles. We've been researching controlled nuclear fusion since the 1950s and we haven't made much progress. But it will solve so many problems that it's worth spending vast amounts of money on this field. Any technology that doesn't violate any fundamental laws of physics will one day work.

2006-06-13 17:16:08 · answer #1 · answered by zee_prime 6 · 0 0

Absolutely not. There presently exist technologies, such as tidal and solar-thermal power, that are by themselves sufficient to supply the world's energy needs using only renewable resources and with minimal environmental impact. But they remain unused, the air remains polluted, the oil remains used, and the world remains warm. Why? Beceause these technologies are deemed too expensive. Fusion power, if perfected, will have exactly the same problem. Even the best estimates suggest that running a fusion plant will be as or more expensive than running a nuclear fission plant, and you still have to deal with radioactive waste (yes, there are no used fuel rods to dispose of, but fusion puts out a lot of neutrons, and those will irradiate the reactor walls, requiring regular replacement and disposal of the old walls). As such, the world's energy problems will be no more solved by the perfection of fusion than they are right now.

2006-06-13 17:14:27 · answer #2 · answered by Pascal 7 · 0 0

It takes greater power to incorporate the ability than may well be used. the situation would be that the ideological environmentalists that limit and stop coal and nuclear means for use, will additionally locate excuses for why fusion should not be used. although wind turbines value 8 to 80 circumstances as much as common means production, the ideological environmentalists petition against using wind turbines, and additionally block setting up the means transmission traces to get the means from the turbines to the grid traces. we've better than 150 years of petroleum, 3 hundred or greater years of organic gas, better than 500 years of coal. Why can we would desire to ration immediately? Oh, and we've better than 1000 (1000) years of methane hydrate we are in a position to se with new technologies examined in winter of 2007 to 2008. we don't have an power situation, we've an intense ideological environmentalist situation. they do no longer choose us to apply carbon fuels or nuclear means in any way or style. If all the nuclear supplies have been accumulated into one place, it would purely approximately fill a intense-college basketball court docket from basket to basket and approximately 20 ft intense - it particularly is each thing from 1940 till immediately's nuclear supplies. Senator Reid isn't allowing us to apply Yucca Mountain repository that we spent billions or trillions to set u for 10,000 year spent gas storage. it is an ideological situation, no longer an power situation. no person tells you those information, do they?

2016-12-08 20:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by briana 4 · 0 0

Not quite yet. I did a research on your question, and I got this: Nuclear waste should better off be stored on the moon. THe problem won't be completely solved because the request for electricity in ASIA only by 2020 will rise from 56- 78% because of population. OIL, is running out in a few decades. Check the following site out below:

www.oil.com

2006-06-13 17:09:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is no single thing that will SOLVE all of the world's energy problems, but fusion will get us pretty close. We already "know" how to produce and harness fusion, but we haven't yet developed the technology to do it safely and reliably.

2006-06-13 17:09:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

absolutely boss ..if any scientist finds how to intiate a controlled and sustained nuclear fusion the world will meet out all its energy problems..even every human would get free electricity for home usage

2006-06-13 17:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by Empty_life 2 · 0 0

Technology or innovation for energy production is not the constraint..... it is economics and politics & NGO

2006-06-13 17:43:20 · answer #7 · answered by Rohit 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers