I would. I'm a strong feminist and believe women are just as capable as men and should be able to assume presidency.
2006-06-13 16:58:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Depends on who she is running against. While I certainly know that women are just as (if not more) capable as men to run the country I would choose a man if I liked them more. If we had more idiots running like this last election, yes, I totally would vote for her.
2006-06-13 17:03:08 · answer #1 · answered by Eleanor Rigby 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would not. It's not that I cannot envision a female president, however I do not like Hilary Clinton and I would most likely not vote for her. I think of myself as someone who supports gender equality totally, but I would be forced to vote for a republican like John McCain over her. I'm not republican, but he seems much more stable to me. I would love if Al Gore would run he has been attempting to bring up the problems facing our world for a very long time. It's a shame that this movie of his was the first time some people have witnessed this. In the end, there are numerous people that I would vote for before Hilary.
2006-06-14 00:18:52 · answer #2 · answered by beardedbarefooter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would sooner cut off my left pinkie finger.
Nothing wrong with a women being president, just a problem with Hillary Clinton being president.
Just wondering though, why ask about 2012 and not 2008?
2006-06-14 00:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anon28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd just vote for her to see change in presidential office. This country is going hell anyway, I don't think it's gonna make a difference if it's a woman or a man in office; I'd like to see a woman leading the nation at least once before I die.
2006-06-14 00:03:12 · answer #4 · answered by TheAnomaly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all- it's MRS. CLINTON. She hasn't divorced or separated from her husband, so keep the title straight.
As for voting for her- I WOULD NOT support her until she distances herself from being practically a 'moderate republican'. She has run so far towards the center of the politcal spectrum that she doesn't realize she has actually PASSED it!
And I won't even bother to talk about her stance on the Iraqi 'occupation'...
2006-06-14 00:10:28 · answer #5 · answered by erni_evilsizer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2006-06-14 00:17:41 · answer #6 · answered by PRHPS 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if there was a sitting Democrat that was elected in 2008.I would give him a second term if he didn't start a damn war! Otherwise I probably would, but 48 % have already said they would not.
Heck, half of those will be dead in 2016!
2006-06-14 00:07:35 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Voting for a woman because she's a woman is the ultimate act of an idiotic feminazi. Please find a better reason to vote for someone other than their sex. Say it's because of her healthcare ideas, or because of her outlook on foreign policy. Just please for the sake of the real women of the country, don't vote for her because she's a woman.
P.S. Condi in '08
2006-06-14 00:05:45 · answer #8 · answered by Self-Sufficient 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. As long as she's not on the Republican ticket i'll vote for any woman. Anyone out there thinking Suze Orman?
2006-06-14 00:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by rugmasterstill 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for the devil himself before I would vote for Hillary Robthem Clinton. At least with him you would know where you stand.
It is not because she is a woman, it is because she is a liberal socialist. I would vote for a woman, just not her!
2006-06-14 00:06:13 · answer #10 · answered by fire4511 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋