I think Ann Coulter should shut the fuc.k up.
pretty simple.
2006-06-13 15:21:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Please be correct, Ann Coulter was writing about four specific 9/11 widows who are clearly partisan and put themselves in the public and political arena by bashing the President. Don't get me wrong, I believe in freedom of speech, but I also believe that with that speech comes responsibility. Ann Coulter is being attacked from all sides over her comments, which by the way, I think were correct, while these women, because they lost loved ones in the attack of 9/11 are free to say whatever they want without being answered. The Democratic Party uses grieving widows, mothers, fathers, whomever they can to suit their purpose. When they have want they want they conveniently drop these individuals. Where is Cindy Sheehan now???
2006-06-13 22:18:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harsh, hypocritical....but right
They've certainly put themselves in the limelight because of their husbands being killed in 9/11. How many other people had relatives die but aren't making an exorbitant amount of money off of that event?
On the other hand, Coulter is stirring up trouble and being controversial with this issue and it sells books. Even though Coulter didn't have a relative that died in 9/11, she is still in a sense making money off of those that died.
2006-06-13 22:07:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by steveb106 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
She is just trying to sell her book, trouble is there are people in the country that hang on her every word, like it was the truth or something. She's both because the repugs will eat it up. Crazy like a fox, and a ***** at the same time.
2006-06-13 22:05:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the shoe fits, wear it.
In every tragedy, there will be people who exploit it. Look at lawsuits filed on behalf of a dead family member. No amount of money brings a loved one back.
If the 9/11 widows are exploiters, then they are the "Witches of Brunswick."
2006-06-13 22:05:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if you want a counterpoint to her conservative voice, try Al Franken ...he doesn't much care for her, and vice versa!
2006-06-13 22:10:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rev Debi Brady 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think she will say anything to sell a lot of books... it seems to be working for her...
2006-06-13 22:04:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i can't tell you what i think, since i don't know what the comments where. what was the comment?
2006-06-13 22:12:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by onlyjumi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's both.
2006-06-13 22:03:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋