Who thinks Iran should be allow to pursue nuclear energy and why?

Answer 1

I think no country should do this.But as long as there are several countries who are allowed to use nuclear energy,Iran has also every right to.

Answer 2

If we think what Hitler would have done if he had nuclear energy in 1945...we should think what will Iran do if it has nuclear energy today 2006!

Hate always functions the same in all Human Beings, no matter the time frame.

Answer 3

No. The only people who believe they should are the Koolaide drinking lefties that want to treat everyone as if they were 2nd graders "here's a cookie for you..and one for you...and one for you.." NEWSFLASH, making it "fair" and letting everyone pursue these weapons will lead to the end of the world. I don't believe any country should have them. The idea behind them is total destruction of mankind. Whats the point in having one, if none of us will survive to say "haha...ours was bigger than yours!"

Answer 4

No that time has passed.........."Haven't you had enough of the brute, stupid, childish, and, otherwise, adolescent, exploitative representation of human (or, re ally, sub-human) existence that is played out daily (in the name, and on the lives, of each and every born human being) by competing governments, politicians, militarists, scientists, technocrats, social planners, educators, exoteric and fundamentalist religionists (who aggressively propagate the provincial, and pharisaical, religions of ego-salvation, rather than practice the universal, and ego-transcending, religion of love), and media hypers (who thrive on the invention and exaggeration of conflict, and dramatically showcase the worst of human instincts in the unending "gotcha" game that denudes and exposes and trivializes and hypocritically mocks the highs, and the inevitable lows, and even the natural ordinariness in the struggling efforts of humankind)? Isn't it evident, in your deepest feeling-psyche, that this Wisdom-renouncing world is being controlled by the worst and most superficial conceptions of existence?

It is now time for every one, and all, to understand themselves, and to reclaim the world from the dictatorship of the ego, and from all of those who play at politics (and life in general) as if it were a sporting event that is supposed to excite and entertain every one on television.

Nuclear disarmament is a relatively positive, but still too superficial and piecemeal, effort. It is not a truly curative means, but only another palliative and temporary move in the midst of mankind's traditional advance toward future trouble. There is something more fundamental than the disarmament politics whereby enemies come to a gentlemanly agreement on how to kill one another without destroying one another! What is more fundamental, necessary, and truly curative is that human beings, individually and collectively, understand and transcend that which is in them that leads them to confront one another as opponents and enemies.

It may sound naive to speak of the necessity for the present (childish, and brutishly adolescent) crowd of governments and institutions to understand themselves and renounce the self-imagery and the techniques of enemies, but the feeling that it is naive to speak in such terms is merely a reflection of egoic frustration and despair. Human beings everywhere must now transcend that very frustration and despair if they are going to prevent the enslavement and destruction of mankind.

Humanity is living in bondage now. Mankind is already, presently, globally, bound to egocentric and materialistic idealisms that are suppressing the human freedom to live by Wisdom and Realize the Truth. If human beings do not shake loose from this regime, they are going to suffer the extreme fulfillment of collective egoic destiny, in a "Narcissistic" holocaust that will either enslave mankind (via a technologically robotized political and social order) or (otherwise) destroy mankind (via technologically engineered warfare).

It is not naive to demand a new leadership when those who are led (and who could make the counter-demand for change) number in the billions. Nor is it folly to try to educate mankind when the only alternative is slavery and death. Therefore, I Say to you: All must commit themselves to understand the patterns by which they are now (and have traditionally been) living (both individually and collectively), so that they can then change those patterns and the destinies those patterns will (otherwise) inevitably inflict upon them."

Answer 5

No...and no country should. That will be the cause of the end of the world one day.

Answer 6

Arabs only (i believe, not all arabs). Getting megatons of oil dollars, they started to dream to follow Hitler way.

Answer 7

No, Hell NO