What do you think about Phil Plait's choice of picture? Is it fair?

Question

Look at Phil Plait's crap comparison of the different Cydonia pictures.

Phil Plaits's:
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e397/Bigpappadiaz/cyd-geom.jpg

And the original Viking picture, which got everyone wondering:
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e397/Bigpappadiaz/cydred.jpg

Another straight up and down shot. A lot of those formations line up nicely:
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e397/Bigpappadiaz/cydonia.gif


Phil Plait tacks all that crap on there, gives the worst possible angle, and has the blurriest picture possible just so you can't see what the hell is going on. The Viking picture is much better, and gives you a good look of the area where they found the face of Mars.

Phil Plait needs to deflate his big head and grow some hair, because his crappy debunking site is bunk.

Answer 1

well his choice of picture seem to be pretty good, it has the face in the middle and allows you to view the angles to all the other objects. that is really hard to do on the other photos. Also I believe that he also picked it because it is one of the photos that they use on the enterprise mission. And the enterprise mission and Richard Hoagland use this same photo when they are trying to prove life on mars. I think if he used a different photo you would be all upset that he is not using the same photo, and say he was trying to hide the truth or something.


So why do you keep ragging on Phill Plait? did he steal your girl or something? I see you keep bringing him up. Maybe you are secretly in love with him, you know what they say about people that doth protest too much!

watch out phil, you got an admirer

Answer 2

Carl Sagan said extraodainary claims need the same kind of proof..
So yes he's fair..if you take the time to look for another answer or another view..then its all good..
Theres life on mars..I've seen the pictures