NO
2006-06-13 09:18:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by salponti 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is not a good president whatsoever, we know nobody is perfect but he totally made too many wrong decisions based on politics. I say he totally is a president with poor performance, and I can't believe that he has the wealthiest cabinet of U.S presidents of all time.
2006-06-13 09:24:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by POWER 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe Bush made mistakes but I think he is much better than Kerry or Gore. Clinton was a good president but he should not have lied about getting a BJ.
2006-06-13 09:21:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Quickie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The simple answer is, "no". He's made the same foreign policy mistakes as Nixon / Johnson; the same economic mistakes as Harding / Coolidge that lead to the Depression; the same mistakes in dealing with energy policy as Carter; and has done more damage to science than the Scopes Monkey Trial.
In a word, his presidency will be recorded as one of the worst in the history of the U.S.
2006-06-13 09:22:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that Bush was a good president. Alot better then Bill Clinton, Bush did more . . well we cant say that on all levels!!
2006-06-13 09:24:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kris 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
never has a president ever been so mocked and hated. usually presidents are respected and held high on a pedastool. now u cant go one day with out hearing a bush joke or a video clip on the net making fun of him. hes a loser
2006-06-13 09:20:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by rodie5582 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you have a brain you would know he's an idiot. He should be thrown in jail. Our children are paying for a useless war, and the environment is going down the drain. I would be surprised if a democrat doesn't win the next election. He is an idiot, a liar, a murderer, and a total failure as a president.
2006-06-13 09:22:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scott 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, lots of haters around there. But If you look objectively i think he has done a good job with the hand he dealt. He had 911, which he went int Afghanistan and took care of business. He dealt with a recession and put our economy in one of the best positions in our history. Iraq has not gone like any one would have liked, but we are there and it would do more damage to pull out right now. He may not be the best communicator in the world like Regan or Clinton but he is honest, says what he means, and has surrounded himself with good people to help him get the job done.
2006-06-13 09:32:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by GUNNER624 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's possible that history will treat Bush better than current polls. If nothing else I admire him for standing up to Islamic terrorists and bring democracy to Iraq.
2006-06-13 09:19:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sean 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on who you ask. I believe that when the dust settles in 10 years, historians will talk about the Bush term in the White House and label it a failure.
2006-06-13 09:19:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by se_roddy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would first need to define 'good'. What makes a good president in your view? otherwise you would have as many different responses as there are people in the world, what is good for a United Statesian in Arizona is not necessarily good for a faithful Muslim combatant in Afghanistan or what is good for United Statesian oil corporations is not good for United Statesian environmentalists.
2006-06-13 09:21:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Eli 4
·
0⤊
0⤋