2006-06-13 07:43:16 · 6 answers · asked by Matt McAlister 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
http://sq.4mg.com/IQgenetics.htm
Sloan observes: One could use the above data to argue that environment was as little as 10% responsible for IQ
Good genetics and good parenting do not bring success in life without good opportunities.
The book - Guns, Germs, and Steel is about that.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393317552/002-9249731-8385617?v=glance&n=283155
2006-06-13 08:01:04 · answer #1 · answered by Eric Inri 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nature is the biological need to copulate, nurture is what happens after the child is born without the overall nurturing the child often becames lethargic and often will not live past it's initial months of existence humans need human contact and they absorb information. When it comes to nature in the wild, pack animals raise pups until they are mature enough to fen for tehmselves and make a family of their own-nurture
where as solitary animals are left to fend for themselves-nature.
Thus humans require nurturance not Nature
2006-06-13 08:03:48 · answer #2 · answered by psychologist is in 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nature predisposes people to certain behaviours and sets the limits on certain strengths and traits, the environment inhibits or activates. a person can be naurally intelligent but without knowledge it is useless.
2006-06-13 23:35:27 · answer #3 · answered by softly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nurture
2006-06-13 07:44:51 · answer #4 · answered by justneedascreenname 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Egg.
2006-06-17 07:24:03 · answer #5 · answered by montecalvo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silly question. Both.
2006-06-13 07:46:56 · answer #6 · answered by wis 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋