If so, then explain why..
If not, then explain why not..
Thanks so much for your time.
I am doing a community poll for my high school government class.
2006-06-13 05:57:13 · 8 answers · asked by kaitlyn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I don't agree with the death penalty aspect of it.
There's no way the death penalty should have even been on the table considering Peterson was convicted with purely circumstantial evidence.
2006-06-13 06:01:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do think he is guilty but i was not in the courtroom
but i cant believe he was given the death penalty
on purely circumstantial evidence i will bet he gets a new trial
2006-06-13 06:17:44 · answer #2 · answered by canada1usa0 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did he get convicted ?
I'll get back to you on this.
Absolutely because he was so wrong.
I believe they should cut it off and send him to jail.
Only because I don't believe in killing for killing.
Death is way to good for his type of scum!
I say give him to the Homo's in the jail house!
Much more appropriately lock him in a room with them for about a week!
2006-06-13 06:00:28 · answer #3 · answered by lovelyyounglady92 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, as a mother, I think Lacy's mother should be able to be left alone in a room with him all by herself!! That there is justice!!
2006-06-13 06:03:24 · answer #4 · answered by face9202004 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...he should be put to death as soon as possible. He doesn't deserve the air he breathes.
2006-06-13 06:36:26 · answer #5 · answered by connie777lee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...it was a horrific thing he did and if not for him then who?
2006-06-13 06:03:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ytes--cause he is as guilty as sin
2006-06-13 06:00:29 · answer #7 · answered by Jack Kerouac 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't he dead yet?
2006-06-13 06:00:08 · answer #8 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋