Newspapers paint her as a woman of the night and a gold digger.
2006-06-13 05:41:44 · 18 answers · asked by sinneragain 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
When one marries a famous person the tabloids go with the territory. She should have known this before she married Paul. Along with the benefits comes some sacrifices. Privacy is one of those sacrifices when one becomes famous or is married to one who is famous.
2006-06-13 05:44:47 · answer #1 · answered by lynda_is 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not at all, it is a divorce, but the media loves to make a circus out of these type of things. How do you think a marriage is going to end with such an age difference between them.
I don't scrutnize Paul McCartney for doing some of his work in Wings or the song with Michael Jackson or even his last album.
2006-06-13 05:46:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Total Gold Digger - Paul's just got far too much class to call her on it in public. She is after all the mother to his newest child.
In Smiddy's view, she deserves nothing more than half of whatever Paul accrued during their four years of marriage, plus sufficient funding to do the child right. She has no claim on what Paul achieved before the witch was ever born!
2006-06-13 05:44:54 · answer #3 · answered by Smiddy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, pretty much. She's pretty selfish and also a gold digger.
It's pretty lame when you use your amputated leg to get extreme amounts of attention and gain. She has absolutely no morals. She deserves nothing from Paul McCartney, but she will never go without that is for sure. He's probably happy to pay her whatever just to get away for her selfish a$$.
2006-06-13 05:47:27 · answer #4 · answered by DeltaQueen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A- He had the opportunity for a pre-nup and HE chose not to sign it.
B- I think if she were only in it for money it wouldn't have lasted this long.
C- Divorce happens to "regular" people every day and I can't imagine how horrendous it would be to have every little bit of nastiness brought out for the world to comment on. Even worse... much of what is reported is just speculation or a total fabrication.
2006-06-13 06:26:34 · answer #5 · answered by Elizabeth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its coz she actually was a woman of the night,
and she is a gold digger....If she isnt interested in his money-why doesnt she publicly come out and tell the press she wants none of it??
2006-06-13 05:43:25 · answer #6 · answered by sidesix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree if you choose to marry a beatle of all people you must be expected to be under the public eye at all times. If you shoose a career that puts you in the spot light you have to expect the public in your personal business
2006-06-13 05:47:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I enjoy Paul's music every since a small age. Plus my dad fed me on it. lol This is someone that he loved and a ex.. who he's going to deal with, they have a child. Later on this child will have to look at these tabloaids. It's very sad. They should leave their noses out of it. Plus finding something bad in Paul is difficult! :D
2006-06-13 05:48:48 · answer #8 · answered by art_chick2004 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think anyone deserves such scrutiny. Gossip sucks *ss.
2006-06-13 05:47:08 · answer #9 · answered by Michael F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, she doesn't but the newspaper blow things out of proportion and make them a bigger story than they are so people's interest will be peaked and they will buy the paper to get the scoop.
2006-06-13 05:44:25 · answer #10 · answered by captures_sunsets 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋