Best practice for breaking down corporate silos?

Question

Has anyone working for a major U.S. corporation had a good practice for breaking down the silos that exist between business units and corporate functions? If so, would you share your success stories and methods used? What kind of culture fosters good cross company collaboration? Are their dashboards that measure this? Good books or articles on the topic?

Answer 1

Success rates vary with individuals, not with the corporation, and it is all in the leadership STYLE. You have to learn to achieve results through INFLUENCE rather than by having direct power over subordinates. That's difficult for newer/less skilled professionals to do, because managing by influence means earning people's respect and harnessing their natural motivation, and not really managing at all. If you walk into someone else's shop barking orders, what do you think will happen? If, on the other hand, you pitch in as one of the team to help them accomplish their goals, you will create a totally different perception and will earn their cooperation in return.

Yes, it works. I was able to get regional/branch people to help me with a big corporate project once because the month earlier, I had gotten on a plane to go pull an all-nighter with them on a big systems conversion. They said "you were the only one from corporate who was really WITH us all the way!"

Read any of Warren Bennis's works on leadership, and he will explain the concept. I was very lucky to participate in Professor Bennis's Leadership Seminar in the MBA program at Southern Cal.

Answer 2

ok, yet what's the element of this magic? exhilaration, means, what? Will it make you a greater useful guy or woman or replace the type you behave to others, or is it basically a posh game, or maybe its purely particularly state-of-the-artwork undies-( in case you get my meaning.) ? EDIT: I see no distinction between innovations and heart (i do no longer mean the innovations and that blood pumping muscle in the chest, the two.) innovations is what all of us are, in reality- it particularly is the place the thoughts come from and that's the place the feelings are judged. What i'm questioning is what's the element of "knocking down the moon" previous the satisfaction of choose. EDIT: Granted that intercourse may well be remarkable if all in touch are enlightened by utilising Tantric teachings yet I don’t see the way it’s unique to intercourse. Being spiritually wakened potential each thing is proper and a keen exhilaration may well be had from each journey from washing the dishes to portray a image. song can deliver one to a state of ecstasy if liked for what it is. i be attentive to that the innovations is inspired earlier, for the time of, and after lovemaking- there’s not often a greater best time to faucet the muse (ha ha.). yet heightened exhilaration throughout the act because of the fact of a undeniable mindfulness would not appear like better than particularly solid intercourse. It starts and it ends and in the technique perhaps an information of a few thing is given gentle yet it is not unique to intercourse, neither is it trouble-free to intercourse, neither is it the objective of having intercourse. existence is going on in plenty an identical way in a while and we’ve no longer made he international a greater useful place because of the fact of lovemaking. perhaps there’s some thing I’m purely no longer getting. And if it may’t be defined in words then why are you attempting to achieve this? i admire the poetry and that i can delight in the meaning yet brush away the poetic ornament and it sort of sounds like we’re doing no longer something better than discussing a pleasant place. : )