He is a dummy and he needs to lose weight, take a bath, shave, and find himself another country to live in. His statements movies are based on lies and half truths. Talk about a kook there is one in person.
2006-06-13 05:34:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by retired_afmil 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't know him personally, so I can't tell. He's no worse than Ann Coulter is at manipulating thoughts, if that is what you were going for.
And Shep...just because two US Marines are holding a sign saying F**k Michael Moore, doesn't mean that ALL the troops support Bush. That's as dumb as saying since I don't like Bush, then all Democrats hate America. Very fallacious statement.
2006-06-13 12:19:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by bluejacket8j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. He plays on peoples fears for his own advancement. Farenheit 911 was full of facts that were twisted so that he can advance his agenda. Unfortunatly hollywood does the same. They live in their own world without a clue on how the other 99.9% of the world lives. Also alot of people don't get all the facts on problems and simplt believe what these people like Moore say.
2006-06-13 12:17:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by me 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I wasn't feeling Fahrenheit 9/11 as much as I felt Bowling For Columbine, mostly because he interjected so much personal commentary into his "documentary" (which in my mind, ideally, should be objective-- the facts speaking for themselves). Some of his info and editing, at times, seems to spin things to his favor, I thought his visit to Heston's house in BFC was a $h!tty move, and the South Park guys have beef with him over how he included that cartoon in BFC, making appear as though it were created by Stone and Parker (the cartoon had very similar appearance to South Park), when, in fact, they had nothing to do with it.
Janky moves and $h!t like that, just to make it seem like you've got some heads to have your back, pose mad threats to integrity. I'm feeling what he's doing it, but not how he's doing it.
2006-06-13 12:18:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ishotvoltron 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's better than Rove's puppet in thw White House now.
He tried to be,but his message got muddled when he showed the scene with all the coffins of the dead soliders.
At the time that secene was taped,Bush was somewhere plotting his next venture capitalism.Death to thousands of little guys is merely another inconvienent truth.
But those dead are MY fellow Americans.
2006-06-13 12:18:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does that mean, 'A good guy?'
Does he manipulate the truth in order to bring the public to the conclusion he thinks is the right one-yes.
Is that kind of like lying-yes.
Is that exactly what the Bush administration did with the war in Iraq?-You betcha!
So is he like Bush- YES!
As for being a 'good guy'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I've never met him.
2006-06-13 12:17:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by iank 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who would know except for people who have contact with him?
You are trying to start a fracas.
MICAHEL MOORE'S movies are GOOD and thought -provoking.
Nimrods hate him for pointing out certain truths.
YOU GO ON M.M. !!!
2006-06-13 12:17:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by alexus509 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He might be a good person as a human being, but he wouldn't be able to recognize a true US historical fact about an election or a war even if it was tatooed to his very small johnson.
2006-06-13 12:20:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by andyandy28227 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He got a point in his film!
Just because many do not agree with what he does, doesnt mean he is bad. He just wants Americans to look at issues in defferent perspectives to open for discussion etc.
2006-06-13 12:23:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Negative. A picture says a thousand words, click below:
http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com/archives/001177.html
2006-06-13 12:15:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shep 5
·
0⤊
0⤋