wHY DO YOU think Charles Darwin's evolution theory is wrong?

Question

pLEASE tELL mE

Answer 1

Darwin's theory of evolution isn't entirely wrong. However what does seem wrong is that while it is able to explain the phenomena of selection as well as survival in animals, humans seem to violate the very postulates of the theory.
Also darwin's theor talks about sexual selection where the male is generally the better-looking or stronger etc of the two genders and that the female choose the one who is stronger/better looking/can sing better etc...but then there are certain birds where instead of the male it is the female that has the coloured plummange and looks better.

Better research some specific examples in case you need to prove a point to someone

Answer 2

It's not wrong. Evolution by natural selection is an established fact. You can see it around you today in the evolution of bacteria and viruses to become resistant to the drugs we used to use to kill them.
Charles Darwin got some of the mechanisms and timelines wrong in his original theory -- that's the beauty of science, as new information is learned it is incorporated into existing theories and models to make them more accurate. It's not surprising that he didn't get everything right, seeing as how he came up with the original theory nearly 150 years ago and we've learned an awful lot since then. But the mechanism of evolution by natural selection has stood the test of time, and the evidence of another 150 years of scientific research has proven him right in his basic premise, while no scientific evidence has come out to prove the basic premise wrong.

Answer 3

Darwin, his contemporaries, and people today will believe in anything to try to remove God from the equation. There is actually more evidence for creation than for evolution. There have never been fossils found that prove a jump in species (i.e. the 'missing link' from ape to man). Also, just look at the world around you. Do you really think this could have happened by accident. I have more faith in a chimp typing an unabridged dictionary perfectly word for word than in Darwin's theory. (By the way...the chances of evolution actually happening to bring us where we are today are the same as that chimp typing that dictionary perfectly).

Answer 4

I believe man had to come up with a theory to believe in. This was due to the fact that man can't explain the gaps in history. Therefore Charles Darwin formulated his evolution theory, which I neither agree nor disagree with.

Answer 5

properly finished secret, :) To play devils recommend... some issues that would desire to disprove darwins concept of evolution... there's no form of heridity- shown fake with the hit upon of DNA and genetics An in any different case in explicably lost fossil, at the same time with a precambrian rabbit- despite if such have been chanced on it would basically recommend that rabbits and mammals superior plenty quicker, although greater information may well be mandatory notice: the pauluxy tracks have been shown to be a geologic anomaly, no longer human footprints in dinosaur ones some sort of information that species on no account replace- this has already been shown fake by utilising the trouble-free reality that issues DO replace, that's effectively aparent it particularly is approximately it, yet on account that none of those exist in the actual international...

Answer 6

I don't think Charles Darwin Theory is wrong. There is a lot of evidence to support it.

Answer 7

I don't think its wrong....I just think that its too simple. Some things I've observed in nature seems to suggest some intelligent hand not just random mutations. Take snake venom....at first snakes would have been some form of venomless reptile. Killing and eating by brute force. Did one individual snake saliva mutate to contain a venom. How much of an advantage was it that his genes passed on to all the rest. How did the mutation occur and what's more his skeleton would have to mutate as well to suit a venom delivery system, fangs,...my point is that venom in snake makes it a pretty efficient killer, I don't see how on pure random events it developed it. It seems too perfect you see. I believe in evolution with a guiding intelligent hand. Natural selection occurs but there is an intelligence behind it if you look closely.

Answer 8

I have a problem thinking we evolved from monkeys but there are still things that do support his theories.

Answer 9

It isn't. All scientific evidence supports it.

Answer 10

i dont know if it is right or not but....if we evolved from monkeys ...why are there still monkeys?? didnt other animal evolve in different ways?? and didnt they all evolve not just half?