English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Credit goes to Woody Allen for this, the description of an Epistemology Course he envisioned.

2006-06-12 22:04:27 · 5 answers · asked by trendwatcher 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

5 answers

Well as used above then knowledge would be the subject/noun and so one supposes that the adjective-knowable would be able to describe it. He's probably got a good point and good grammar. It is deep though; if there's ten answers on this then they will all differ.

Thanks to English being fcuked up in schools now and nobody understands it. Especially not the 'tutors'- 70% of them don't know what constitutes a sentence.

Though I did pass O-level English for My College Diploma and my tutor said that I have 'perfect grammar'.

2006-06-12 22:23:09 · answer #1 · answered by smile4763 4 · 0 0

As far as the grammer goes, I agree with the first answer. But, I strongly believe the layers of understanding as layers of beings and different frequencies. 1st level of knowledge can be understood by second level, so on....also at the end there is a level of awareness which is beyond all knowledge and without being a specific knower also. That level of knowledge is called enlightned knowledge. There one will be able to see without he being existing, when there is a totally detached knowledge, or a state of mind which is able to see knowledge as a seperate entity, it is always knowable.

2006-06-13 01:24:05 · answer #2 · answered by r_govardhanam 3 · 0 0

properly i might say that, if we talk approximately wisdom, then it may desire to exist in view that we renowned it so. on the different hand, how do we actually comprehend that something is which includes evidently? there is understanding and not understanding, yet wisdom as a typical concept implies fact. in this gentle, how will all of us comprehend that what we see is the worldwide in its genuine hues? Is all of it a social build that we each and each journey subjectively, or is each and every thing an purpose and scientifically inflexible "map" that we are going to sooner or later detect? i've got self assurance in social constructionism. And good morning! =oD

2016-12-08 08:41:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who is the government?

2006-06-19 19:35:52 · answer #4 · answered by wamax2004 2 · 0 0

if u got money if u spend it it decreases but if u have knowledge if u spend this money it keeps on increasing

2006-06-13 21:13:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers