Afghanistan is bigger and larger than Iraq. But US only has about 20,000 troops in Afghanistan versus 150,000 in Iraq. Why aren't we sending more troops to catch Osama? After all, it wasn't Sadam but it was Osama who attacked America
2006-06-12 20:05:48 · 4 answers · asked by JOE 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Um, yeah. You're right all the way. We left the job half finished and ran off to start another war we didn't need to. Now Osama is still out there, terrorists have a new breeding ground in the chaotic Iraq, and druglords and the Taliban are resurfacing in Afghanistan. I wish I had a better answer for you.
2006-06-12 20:35:12 · answer #1 · answered by smurfette 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As a US Marine, let me ask you a question, Why don't you enlist and fight for your country? We are over extended and fighting in many conflicts, for the right for you to sit on your butt and ask dumb questions, How about we put the draft into effect again and give the ones fighting for your rights a break? Would you be willing to do that? If not then shut up!
2006-06-13 03:26:51 · answer #2 · answered by basscatcher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lies, polotics, who knows? I never really thought of that. Maybe Iraq has mor oil perhaps?
2006-06-13 03:12:59 · answer #3 · answered by *Samantha* 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because they're all in Iraq.
2006-06-13 03:29:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋