2006-06-12 16:00:20 · 9 answers · asked by sgfrd2000 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
I don't see any reason why not. As long as you are serious enough to want to take the class. Its all about obtaining knowledge aftewr all. I don't know what your situation is, however I do know that credit classes can be pricey.
2006-06-12 16:11:14 · answer #1 · answered by mrs.toad 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If one studies the history of anything intensively they are free to consider themselves a historian. What is not clear in the question is whether one is seeking pay or employment under that title. If study is for pleasure than an individual can consider themselves to be anything they wish, for it is only their own opinion that matters. If having that title is important and the study is intensive, then by all means, one is not an imposter by saying they are a historian for they would adequately be able to fill the shoes of the requirements. If one is seeking pay, they would have to see if they meet the requirements of the employer.
2006-06-26 05:00:16 · answer #2 · answered by J V 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as you study and document history, you're a historian, whether it's for pleasure, teaching, or profit.
2006-06-26 05:07:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who both reads and writes history is a historian.
2006-06-13 08:08:40 · answer #4 · answered by Keith P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We never stop learning, even historians, so yes. One Love People.
2006-06-25 21:56:02 · answer #5 · answered by zenhoss 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-06-24 01:35:45 · answer #6 · answered by V_for_VENDETTA 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep!
2006-06-25 16:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by Rainbow 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a persons work should be joyful.
2006-06-22 00:21:47 · answer #8 · answered by punchpringle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure why not:)
2006-06-26 01:15:45 · answer #9 · answered by For3v3rmore 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋