You are suffering from a bad case of "Good Sense". Drink some Kool-Aid and call Ann Coulter.
2006-06-12 15:47:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by GrandPoobaah 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No ...
Imagine.......
A big earthquake with the strength of 8.1 on the Richter
scale hits Mexico.
Two million Mexicans have died and over a million are
injured.
The country is totally ruined and the government doesn't
know where to start with asking for help to rebuild.
The rest of the world is in shock.
Canada is sending troopers to help the Mexican army control
the riots.
Saudi Arabia is sending oil.
Other Latin American countries are sending supplies.
The European community (except France) is sending food and
money.
The United States, not be outdone, Bush is sending two million
replacement Mexicans.
God Bless America.
2006-06-13 01:58:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by impeachgwb 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee, I thought you were quite polite, until I got to the comment after your question. Must be a child........yes you have the right to disagree with PRESIDENT Bush (he does have a title), of course, but try doing it like an adult, not a smart mouthed kid. Why do you have to ask, even he has said more times than anyone could possibly count that people can disagree. Did you agree with every single thing that former President Clinton said?
2006-06-12 23:19:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not wrong to disagree with a sitting president ; however , what most people object to is blatant lies & disrespect for the man who was elected into the highest office -which only serves to ridicule ones' own country in the eyes of those outside the U.S. Those inside the U.S. elected the best man for the job .That is one reason John Kerry didn't get the vote. Americans tend to shun treasonous behavior .I don't agree with every word uttered by the president -for instance i disagree with the death penalty and would campaign to abolish it -however-I am not going to play into the hands of the enemy by disrespecting a sitting president. Besides-I'm pretty fond of "W" ..
2006-06-12 22:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would only be wrong of you to disagree with him just because he is Bush, as so many people do. I may or may not think he is less than what I had hoped for, but only becasue I took the time to dig down through the media hype, and evaluate his performance on my own.
Rely on the media to tell you what happened, not how to feel about it. Don't let the Democrats tell you he's a bum. Don't let the Republicans blindly defend him. The truth always lies in the murky middle, but be your own person with your own mind.
2006-06-12 22:50:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by electricpole 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be a sheep and even believe that he landed a plane on the Abraham Lincoln. By the way I was there and we hated it it. We had to stay a week longer at see after six months away from the people we love.
2006-06-12 22:55:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by carflot22 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is absloutely RIGHT of you to disagree. It would be wrong to be a sheep. Demoracy relies on an informed, active populus, and on the voters NOT being sheep.
2006-06-12 22:47:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by magicwriter65 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is America. Of course, it isn't wrong to disagree with anyone, but if you start bashing the president - then it's wrong. There is a fine line between disagreeing and disrespect.
2006-06-12 22:47:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by just a mom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's wrong if you were old enough to vote and didn't vote for anyone. u don't have to believe him. you can disagree. respect the fact that over 50% of the votes were cast for him to lead our country for 4 years, unlike the 40% votes for his predecessor while over 60% voted for others. Did you vote for him? Are you registered to vote?
2006-06-12 22:52:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by stone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think almost everyone disagrees with Bush.
He is a well intentioned idiot.
The 29 percent that approve of him are lying or misinformed.
2006-06-12 22:46:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋