The liberals are saying American Soldiers beat him to death, and I really wish it were true. It would still be better than he deserves. A really fitting end for him would have been decapitation. What do you think?
2006-06-12
13:26:31
·
8 answers
·
asked by
jack f
7
in
News & Events
➔ Other - News & Events
Porkchop: braindead hick soldiers? Its one thing to be against the war, but to attack our soldiers who risk their lives so your skinny *** can be free is very unpatriotic. Is Jane Fonda your role model?
2006-06-13
17:19:36 ·
update #1
SW it is not anger. Afterall, I never met the man, and he did nothing to me personally. But he has killed and beheaded many americans, and killed thousands of Iraqis. He lived by the sword and died by the sword, but he did worse to others than what he got. His beheadings were certainly worse than the bombing. I think a fitting death would have been by the boots of american soldiers. And I say that without anger, I call it justice. BTW, I am no KKK member, I am not even white. Sucka!!!
2006-06-18
18:14:29 ·
update #2