English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Oh...that is too funny. It may be too far apart to be reincarnation. But who knows. Maybe you sit in waiting for a year for a suitable parent match. Ha!

Although I don't like Bush...at all...I can't stand him. Ignorant fool. I'm not quite ready to compare him to Hitler. Hitler was far more cruel than Georgie ever will be. George is just plain ignorant with a hint of evil masked by false Christianity. And in some ways, he is a killer...maybe not directly. But he is responsible for the deaths of thousands. Funny question though. Made me laugh.

2006-06-12 15:04:37 · answer #1 · answered by zenkitty27 5 · 7 4

Hitler died 14 months and 6 days before George Bush was born not 9 months. If it was 9 months than that is a coincidence.

2006-06-12 19:58:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Judge for yourself:

THE BUSH DOCTRINE



All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be exerted in this direction. The more modest its intellectual ballast, the more exclusively it takes into consideration the emotions of the masses, the more effective it will be.

The art of propaganda lies in understanding the emotional ideas of the great masses and finding, through a psychologically correct form, the way to the attention and thence to the heart of the broad masses. Once we understand how necessary it is for propaganda to be adjusted to the broad mass, the following rule results:

It is a mistake to make propaganda many-sided, like scientific instruction, for instance.

The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in sloans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan. As soon as you sacrifice this slogan and try to be many-sided, the effect will piddle away, for the crowd can neither digest nor retain the material offered. In this way the result is weakened and in the end entirely cancelled out.

~ Adolph Hitler "Mein Kampf - War Propaganda"

State of the Union: Fascism with a Smile—Part I

"There are those who always say that it cannot happen here. That was also what many were saying in Germany in the 1930s. The Nazi’s crimes were the official legal acts and policies of modern Germany—an educated, civilized Western European nation. Much like the U.S. of today, it was a country renowned throughout the world for its industrial and cultural achievements. In fact, Berlin was the epitome of the modern city. Freedom in everything seemed to be the new clarion call in Germany. However, within a short time, Germany became part and parcel to some of the most barbaric acts ever perpetrated by a people."
http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=318

State of the Union: Fascism with a Smile—Part II

It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.
— Nazi Field Marshal Hermann Goering, testimony at Nuremberg

http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=319

Hitler's Enabling Act

http://www.govsux.com/enable.htm

2006-06-12 19:59:37 · answer #3 · answered by parshooter 5 · 0 0

Check your facts. You don't even know the guy's name!! The 41st president was George H. W. Bush. The current president is George W. Bush. For him to be a Jr. he would have to have the same name as his father, which he does not. Yahoo should do an intelligence test before allowing some people to post questions.

Unless you are referring to another George W. Bush Jr. who actually had a father named George W. Bush Sr.

If that is the case, I apologize and you have passed the intelligence test, although I doubt that is the case.

2006-06-12 20:30:16 · answer #4 · answered by nick_1965 4 · 0 0

Let me see for his country ( at least before America joined the wall)

He used gun control ( Bush is against it) it ended most unemployment ( bush has not done that)
He started firm immigration policies ( Bush has not done that either)

He started great industrial growth in the nation ( well you know bushes history)

He actually won the wars against other nations taking them over completely. ( Bush can't win against a tiny nation smaller than some of our states)

Had Hitler just stoped with Europe and did a treaty with Rome, the remainder of France and England, then he could have keep the rest and the US would never have gotten invovled.

So if he did have Hitlers traits we may have been alot better off, for our nation anyway.

** Not saying Hitler was good, or great or that he was not a real nut case, but for his general population, untill he started the racial issues against the Jews and the gypsies, his actual nation grew and was doing great,

His approval rate would have been in the 90's percent prior to his take over the world attempt.

2006-06-12 20:02:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh yeah, compare Bush to a butcher because you don't like him...

There's no one comparable to that idiotic Hitler, given Bush isn't the sharpest tool in the shed. But you are giving meat to a skeleton that deserved to be grinded as a limestone... Hitler.

There are millions of people born in 1946, called "baby boomers" from the returning sex-craved GIs of 1945... and you chose Bush?

You must be careful with your comparison. I understand that Bush is not a favorite.

2006-06-12 20:03:54 · answer #6 · answered by azrach187 3 · 0 0

Coincidence. George Walker Bush is by no means Hitler's reincarnation... I promise you. Antichrist, maybe, Hitler, no.

2006-06-12 19:57:55 · answer #7 · answered by Alley S. 6 · 0 0

My father was born june 6 1946 , and it is no reincarnation or
coinccidence Thanking you for you joke

2006-06-12 20:10:09 · answer #8 · answered by boy_jam_arch 6 · 0 0

Not reincarnation...product of selective breeding experiments. Hitler's sperm was smuggled out of Germany and used to impregnate birth-slaves around the world. There are, right now, hundreds of Hitler descendents working in governments throughout the world (U.S., England, Germany, Russia, China, India) whose one goal to complete the mission of their "true" father.

And the Easter Bunny runs it!

2006-06-12 20:28:19 · answer #9 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 0 0

If you have ever studied anything about reincarnation, it seems that you haven't, but if so, you would have realized that of all the people who have ever lived, Hitler was one of the most evil and is certainly in one of the lowest hells, never to be reborn again.

2006-06-12 20:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by lme_888 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers