2006-06-12 08:56:57 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Define "dominate." Do you mean "become more commercially successful?" Or do you mean "dominate in the ring," in which case it depends entirely on how it's scripted?
2006-06-12 08:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by Jay H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wait a minute, ECW is another brand of WWE. It's not a separate company. WWE is ECW, ECW is WWE! So this question really doesn't make any sense. Now, if you ask if ECW will dominate over RAW and Smackdown!, then the answer would be maybe Smackdown!, but not RAW. RAW will always be better than the other 2 brands. Hopefully, RAW and Smackdown! will join together again, so it won't seem like Smackdown! totally sucks.
2006-06-12 09:36:07 · answer #2 · answered by Cutting Edge 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it will, but I doubt that ECW will be ECW before they start losing money. Will it be the same way that we all ECW love so much? They don't have the Dudley's, Rhino, Lance Storm, Dawn Marie. So the WWE star that went to ECW is just to be there until they get more wrestlers. Because ECW will be in the mix with TNA, basically. WWE is on just Raw vs. SmackDown. WWE need to step their game up with some wrestlers. Because I still watch but its not that interesting like it was in 98, 99, 2000, 01, and 02. Basically when Stone Cold and the Rock was there and the Tag Team divison was good. WWE need to bring better Tag Teams like the Hardy's, E&C, Too Cool(Yeah they was corny, but I liked them), APA, Chuck and Billy, Los Gurreros, Team Angle, and them. I'm tired of them bring in these losers like them REDNECK boys. Will somebody please give Trevor a TAN. DAMN.
2006-06-12 10:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so cause wwe still has the most awesome talent around we still have triple H, the Undertaker,JOHN CENA,the heartbreak kid Shaun Micheals,a some time when the mood is right the texas rattlesnake Stone cold comes out of his hole.only the less popular ones are going to ecw so I wouldn't worry. by the way look at my screen name I chose. I'm not a wrestling fan not by far.NNNOOOOOTTTTT!!!
2006-06-12 09:09:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE has been around a very long time....ECW is a hit and miss kind of group. Granted a good percent of the fighters from one has gone over, they tend to hop back and forth from one organization to another...be patent...returns are predictable, but change allows new stars to find thier way into the WWE.
2006-06-12 11:01:22 · answer #5 · answered by Bishop David F. Milne DD 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's not really a fair question. this isn't the old ECW by any stretch of the imagination. Raw, Smackdown, and ECW are all owned by Vince McMahon, so the only thing ECW can do by succeeding, is make Vince richer
2006-06-12 09:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by jjgeorge_23 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that might happend cus wwe is loseing all their big stars to ecw and soon wwe is just going to have the rookies of the wwe and its going to start to get boreing.
2006-06-12 09:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by nowynkrose 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it will be coool at first but the WWE creative (or lack of creativity) team is the problem when they take over ECW it's all over for the extreme
2006-06-12 12:05:17 · answer #8 · answered by heehaw_fan1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It might. Most of the good wwe stars are leaving too, like Kurt Angle, etc. It definitely might dominate.
2006-06-12 08:59:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ecw is owned by wwe so it doesn't matter and it's all fake
2006-06-12 11:47:04 · answer #10 · answered by josh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋