How come you claim that there was no Al Queda/Iraq connection, AND you claim that Zarqawi has been in Iraq since 2001...before we invaded Iraq? Does that not seem contradictory to you? Or are you trying to have your cake, and eat it too? Probably tastes better than crow, huh?
2006-06-12 07:52:47 · 16 answers · asked by loubean 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Aw you poor thing. Sounds like you have bought into the whole ignorance and stupidity concept.
There is little point in me trying to answer because I'm sure you get all your 'facts' from Faux News and fascist talk radio.
Politics for intelligent people is all about considering what is right for each and every issue. For idiots like you politics is like a football team. You support a team and hate the other teams. In politics you picked a side and now blindly support it. I expect you still think Bush is doing a great job. Maybe one day you will learn to think for yourself instead of acting like a sheep.
2006-06-12 07:59:51 · answer #1 · answered by ZCT 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nice try, are you new at this? The question was whether or not Iraq was sponsoring terrorism and more specifically whether or not they had anything to do with 911. Nobody has ever said that there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq. But the Bush administration tried to draw a direct link between September 11th and Saddam Hussein. They've never proved even a remote link.
2006-06-12 07:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by Hax 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the claim is no Al Qaida/Iraq connection pre-9/11. Since 9/11 was one of the current administration's justifications for the war in Iraq, it would be good for them to present a case that there was such a connection. But they haven't done it, have they?
How do you like YOUR crow? With a side of WMD's?
2006-06-12 07:56:20 · answer #3 · answered by spb1968 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Zarqawi was in Iraq... but he was heading his own terrorist group before 2004 called Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad, but in 2004 he changed the name to Al-Queda in Iraq...
before that Zarqawi did have Osama links, they may have been together during the soviet resistance in Afghanistan and funding, but to say that there was enough for an invasion is laughable... especially since Zarqawi never had any links to Saddam, which is supported by a CIA report ( http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6189795/ )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi
... in short... this is how we claim what you ask...
What are your links other than a timeline that proves nothing? Please have some facts other than a few dates to back up your opinion next time....
2006-06-12 10:14:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I sincerely dislike opposing another female but honey, your statement shows your lack of education on the matter.
1. The 911/Iraqi connection question has been resolved for over a year now with the 911 commission's final report release - stating without a doubt there was no connection between the 911 attack and Iraq.
Maybe u should ask yourself why you have to keep searching for new reasons to justify the war? First it was WMDs, then it was to get rid of Saddam, then it was a 911 connection,.. now I think it's for liberation.
2006-06-12 08:26:34 · answer #5 · answered by Answers R Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should be eating crow. But to understand a liberal puke Democommie would drive you crazy. But then the Democommies believe Michal Moore and Move On. I feel sorry for them.
2006-06-12 08:46:27 · answer #6 · answered by shakeragroad_2000 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just because a group is operating in a country doesn't mean that the country supports the group. For example, the KKK operates in the US. This does not mean that the US is "harboring" or "encouraging" KKK activity.
As a conservative, please do not speak for the rest of us if you're going to continue asking lame questions.
2006-06-12 08:23:59 · answer #7 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one would claim there was no al queda in Iraq. remember, we have al queda operatives here also.
2006-06-12 08:25:20 · answer #8 · answered by shannon d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dear Warmonger:
I claim nothing except that this country has gone to hell under your leadership. I would throw you a life preserver when you sink, but that would be liberal.
2006-06-12 08:43:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
with all due respect...but tell that to the parents of the young boys who are dying every day for an imaginary cause...feel their pain for one minute and im sure your tune would change...i am not a pacifist, but i am a realist
2006-06-12 07:57:41 · answer #10 · answered by dalilvr333 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋