2006-06-12 06:32:10 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
There are pros and cons. Apparently a circumcised penis is cleaner because bacteria doesn't build up and grow under the foreskin.
2006-06-12 06:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by Almost MD 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am not circumcised and I don't have any problems with it. I clean it once or twice a day and before sex... Never had any STD's so it depends on the individual. Circumcision back in the day was a religious practice now everyone say it has benefits, it helps with the clean issue but if a person is a slob then it doesn’t matter. Now it's just a barbaric practice to get your child Circumcised. It’s just wrong it should be every mans decision to make on his own. All I know is that guys out there wish the had that skin there because it’s been proven that Uncircumcised men experience more pleasure than circumcised men. I have also heard horror stories about people getting too much cut off and even getting the tip cut off. My Sister in-law didn't even ask my brother if there son should be cut... She took upon herself to say what's right... It should be the fathers decision. There's nothing wrong with it and it should be made illegal. Just WASH the DANG thing!
2006-06-12 14:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by Mike Hunt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well mcginney I don't know why you are asking this question or whether you are a male or female. I am a bloke who had to have such an operation a few years back (a damaged foreskin). It is better NOT to have a circumcision unless it is medically/surgically necessary. All this talk about your dick being cleaner is tosh... so long as you wash properly this is not an issue. What is an issue is that you lose a great deal of sensitivity after a while and that this will not return. I will make no difference to a woman. But it will make some difference (eventually) to a man. Hope this helps.
2006-06-12 17:55:21 · answer #3 · answered by Yorkie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. And the mother should really make the choice if her child should be circumcised or not because she knows better how it would feel. Anyway, it is healthier and it feels a lot more pleasurable for the woman to be circumcised. Actually only my first boyfriend was not, all others were and to be honest now I would not even consider being sexual with anyone who is not. It does make a big difference. The only men that would tell you that it doesn't are the ones who are not circumcised and think that its too painful to do it. But then you should ask their sexual partners and you will find the truth.
2006-06-12 14:14:27 · answer #4 · answered by fasb123r 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No special benefit.Why reduce length when everybody wants to make it big?It was introduced by Muslims to select and kill non Muslims,during the savage days of Prophet and religious conversion.
2006-06-14 06:19:30 · answer #5 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say yes. No offense to the uncircumcised men but I dont think I would want any sexual relations with an uncircumcised man.
2006-06-12 15:11:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If by better you mean lose about 1/2 of your sensitivity yes..go for it.
Leave it alone it's there for a reason.
2006-06-12 15:05:07 · answer #7 · answered by Dix a Dublin 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it's not natural!!! Also if you wash regularly it won't smell so it will be hygienic. Foreskin prevents the end getting de-sensitised, which in turn can lead to erection problems later on in life. Also you won't enjoy sex as much!!!
2006-06-12 18:08:53 · answer #8 · answered by Rax 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately... Alot cleaner...
2006-06-12 13:38:49 · answer #9 · answered by mboeger1986 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter as long as it does the job!
2006-06-12 13:34:34 · answer #10 · answered by Sunshine 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋