Important? I mean, capturing Saddam Hussein didn't cease the insurgency. How will "bringing to justice" al-Zarqawi change anything? Won't there just be another to take his place? Isn't the problem rooted a bit more deeply than one man (as awful as he was)? Also, it isn't like Osama bin Laden even liked him. Ironic that Osama and Dubbya are cheering for the same thing?
2006-06-12 04:59:55 · 6 answers · asked by AnswerBot 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
As we know, his successor has already assumed the new position as leader and plans to take dramatic action to avenge the death of Zarqawi. However, him being dead is important. It would be worse with him alive. He's the one that viciously beheaded, bombed, and assassinated so many people. He's killed thousands, the majority of which were civilans and a lot of which were Shiite Muslims. Although the violence will still persist, those victims deserved justice and I am glad that the last thing he saw before he died were American Soldiers.
2006-06-13 12:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by Andee 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
1. It was the only good news to come out of Iraq in a long time.
2. Someone will take his place, but he deserved what he got.
3. The problem is rooted deeper than probably any of us can comprehend.
2006-06-12 05:05:24 · answer #2 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God bless him, I named my son musab. I pray in his every birthday. I have his all recorded videos. He was w great leader.
2015-11-20 01:32:32 · answer #3 · answered by fadi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is an idiot!! This will not help one bit. There will always be terror! But i must admit, he hit big with this one
2006-06-12 05:04:11 · answer #4 · answered by holyanswer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Supposedly, there's already a successor, so no, his death isn't important
2006-06-12 05:26:08 · answer #5 · answered by schizerbone 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DEAD
2006-06-12 05:13:35 · answer #6 · answered by snakeman11426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋