2006-06-12 02:36:49 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
be practical, the american and the european will not given their best food, they are the greed master in this world even they are the merchants of death, if only they will truly help the 3rd world they happiness and prosperity will come to this world even world peace will be attained if only they share,
2006-06-12 04:12:41 · answer #1 · answered by lepactodeloupes 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
I think its something to do with the logistics. It'd cost more money to ship it all to where its needed (that's like a whole other Q&A) than it would to transfer the money and purchase the equivalant amount from a local producer. Ethically though its a sound idea.
2006-06-12 09:03:12 · answer #2 · answered by Sit tight 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it should, it should also be given to the less fortunate in Europe and USA as well but it will never happen - the governments are far too greedy and controlling it's disgraceful.
2006-06-12 04:25:09 · answer #3 · answered by missieclass 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes most definately brainstew.
We don`t realise how fortunate and we are with all our "luxuries".
The amount of food that is thrown out from our supermarkets is something else.
Why have we so many supermarkets!! You can only eat so much!!
2006-06-12 02:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by Only Me 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we sould feed the hungry in third world countries. We have more than enough food in both countries.
2006-06-12 02:38:54 · answer #5 · answered by Gunmetal Grey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should, but as long as those governments block the full distribution of the food, it is a futile gesture
2006-06-12 02:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, why should all that food go to waste when others could benefit from it.
2006-06-12 02:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by happyflamepepper 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one word YES
2006-06-12 02:44:49 · answer #8 · answered by The Wanderer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Greed will not permit this :(
2006-06-12 02:41:23 · answer #9 · answered by Chiron 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋