9/11 Eyewitness needs to be explained, this documentary doesn't concern itself with "conspiracy" theories,rather, it scientifically dissects the video and audio evidence made available using strict scientific laws.
The people who did this are endangering the future for us all.
2006-06-11 22:48:02 · 17 answers · asked by peter c 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
This is what keeps everyone in line who was at least marginally involved. A LOT of money has been made by those who were involved, first and foremost, and any "truth revelation" would automatically implicate all those contractors (everyone that makes weapons), corporations (airline bailout anyone?), and private owners ($9 billion on the WTC property deal?) that may have had anything to do with it. Many others were also given promotions despite their negligence on 9/11 for simply going along with the official story, whether they "made it happen" or not.
Many others have profitted immensely from the resulting fear of terrorism and the wave of nationalism sentiment after the attacks. Ask any pro-Bush pundit what their book deals are worth, vs the not-for-profit anti-Bush liberals (Michael Moore is an *** and a very big exception). Ask Fox News what this has meant for their ratings and their advertising value. A LOT of public personalities owe their very existence to the events of 9/11. If this truth should be revealed, they would quickly become irrelevant or traitorous.
What would it mean for politics? Both parties would be like on a sinking ship, fingers would get pointed everywhere, and 3rd party candidates might actually suddenly have some pull for better or worse. Both parties are enjoying their monopoly on political power and the truth would be most upsetting.
What would the truth do for the morale of the American people? Those that fully believed in our benevolent govnernment and have had their simple minds be the subject of propoganda control for years will suddenly wake up and become VERY angry. These same sheep that the neo-conservatives have been counting on for support will become their most violent opposition. Fringe groups on all sides will capitalize on this power vacuum created. Civil war could indeed be a possibility.
2006-06-11 23:04:45 · answer #1 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If speaking out & presenting proof of wrongdoing & negligence by ANYONE, whether the Prez...Government...or Big Bird is endangering the future for us all... THEN AMERICA HAS A BIG PROBLEM. AND IT WON'T BE THOSE PERSONS FAULT THAT SPOKE OUT WITH THE TRUTH NOW WILL IT ?
2006-06-11 23:07:18 · answer #2 · answered by ccchevydude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody's denying that Borah said that. But the statement was still directly aimed at Obama. It's possible to attack someone without ever explicitly mentioning him. By bringing up the historical example of Borah, Bush was attacking the policy of diplomacy, which Obama strongly advocates. It's not hard to understand...
2016-03-15 03:02:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
9/11 happened because of terrorists end of story.
2006-06-11 22:51:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truth is it was ALL Willie Clinton's fault! There! I saved George the trouble...Just for you!
2006-06-11 22:55:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
when are people gonna stop blaming George Bush for everything and get off their a$$es and go get those terrorists?
2006-06-11 22:50:45 · answer #6 · answered by brainlessbandit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he'll tell the truth...when he's old and stricken with Alzhemiers, and the gov. will just brush it off as a deranged tangent from his illness.
2006-06-11 22:52:16 · answer #7 · answered by Hooligan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People blame him coz hes in charge, he isnt going to tell the truth because hes scared that bad things will happen to him
2006-06-11 22:54:44 · answer #8 · answered by FreDDy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after the a time period of 10 years or more.
2006-06-11 22:50:33 · answer #9 · answered by pj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By law, since it would be a breach of security and risk American lives he doesn't have to. I know this isn't something anyone want to hear. And this is sometthing anyone has the power to chack up on. America from a political stance will not under any circumstances give in to terrorists. It's not in it's new found nature. If and whenever there is a threat of any kind the standard procedure is to check all sources of the threat. Afterwards if it is declared that it is a positve threat then it is needed to have those that are in charge of the company to take a vacation. In short those that are absolutely needed to run the company. It is not in America's bet interest we shut down everything we have for an unlisted amount of time. And it can not be made public knowledge that there is an attack out of fear of panic. If the American people shut down then America will become weak. America can not, should not, and will not ever appear weak to anyone for any reason. If a threat is made and nothing happens, then America lost millions and billions of dollars and also flinched to the enemy showing it's weakness. Upon showing weakness it is possible to lose more economic balance. It is fair to say people are just merely numbers in the end, and can be replaced. But, the economy can be wrecked and take years even decades to repair. Not to get too far off the point. America was warned about the attack on 9/11 but, it was not considered serious. Upon knowledge of the planes take over, it was deemed neccessary to evacuate the top stock holders, ceos, and presidents as standard prcedure. It was the hope that the planes would miss the buildings since it would take years of training for the accuracy. But, sadly America was wrong.
2006-06-13 13:15:57 · answer #10 · answered by Oppostion X 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋