2006-06-11 18:38:43 · 18 answers · asked by Belle 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, I would. But NOT for President Bush. I wasn't old enough to vote for him in 2000, but I wouldn't have voted for him, due to my views.
In 2004, I did NOT vote for him, because he was doing a shoddy job as President. He won, but I'm sure that he would have NO chance of winning a third term.
2006-06-11 18:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by amg503 7 · 10⤊ 8⤋
If they did their job well enough. Frankly, I've never quite understood term limits, because what do they say except "if he's really good at the job, we have to make sure he's absolutely not allowed to keep doing it!"
I haven't seen many who were worth re-electing, though I will say this. If that amendment wasn't in place, I doubt George W. Bush would have ever stood a chance being elected President.
2006-06-12 01:42:40 · answer #2 · answered by AndiGravity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if they were doing a good job. I think that some presidents could do more good for the country if they were allowed to serve extra terms.
2006-06-12 01:41:51 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would vote for Thomas Jefferson. He stated that the people should stage a revolution every 20 years.
2006-06-12 01:40:54 · answer #4 · answered by sochiswim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if I agreed with them in order to vote for them the first time.
2006-06-12 01:48:02 · answer #5 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Bush again, I say he is doing great, if anyone has differing opinion because of the war,, contact me I can email you a eye opening fact sheet, it reaffirmed my opinion of George Bush.
2006-06-12 01:41:34 · answer #6 · answered by superunknownuser 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes if I feel they are worth being the President. Can't say much about what we are in now though.
2006-06-12 02:10:38 · answer #7 · answered by KLove 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I think they should get one 6 year term. This way they'd have to spend more time on their duties, instead of worrying about getting re-elected. Alot of countries use this, and it works better.
2006-06-12 01:41:33 · answer #8 · answered by :Phil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think 2 terms is enough! I am thoroughly convinced now!
2006-06-12 01:47:39 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Peace.
2006-06-12 01:42:24 · answer #10 · answered by wildrover 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i think that's what they should do.
This is way things are messed-up because one can straighten it out an another can come in and mess what they have done up.
2006-06-12 01:41:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋