2006-06-11 18:22:36 · 24 answers · asked by trusolja_dareal23 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Not if someone or some country can find a source of energy other than fossil fuels. A source so vast that it cannot be depleted. The history of the world is dominated by search for energy. Pretty soon China or India will come up with an alternate fuel that won't require the burning of fossil fuel. With that event will come the end of corporations that are built around the fossil fuel business. And that will bring about the end of capitalism. It is all about energy and the manipulation of energy.
2006-06-11 20:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by The_Dark_Knight 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes there will be World War 3 , World War 4 and World War 5 ect. History has shown us there will allway be wars. Most wars have allways been about controling of the oil fields. The Romans needed the oil and tar for there torches. to make there swords and many other uses. The Germans also went to war to control the oil fields. If you ever look at there war stradegy of World War 1 and 2 they went straight for the oil fields. Instead of attacking Moscow they went straight to the oil field in Russia. Look at Aggresive countries this way like a bullie. No guy ever started a fight with some one ten times his size. An aggresive country useally way out matches the other country. Its all about control.
2006-06-12 02:19:30 · answer #2 · answered by Robertus911 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe World War 5 will happen. The question is when?
2006-06-12 01:26:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you asking if there will be a global war or just a fight between a couple or few retards with a group of people caught in the middle? There will be a fight very soon, between two retards. It is to be expected. But global war? Nah. There is one thing that one must remember. Life always goes on! Cheers to that!
2006-06-12 01:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by Jesse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES, but not nuclear war. The global war on terror should propperly be called WWIII, if China invades Taiwan & the US with all other democratic powers inthe Pacific defend then that should be called WWIII. If Iraq breaks up creating regional civil war that everyone has to solve, then that's WWIII.
2006-06-12 08:48:47 · answer #5 · answered by djack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully I won't be around. I hate the idea of innocent people dying and that might happen if there is a war.
2006-06-12 01:28:19 · answer #6 · answered by ♥c0c0puffz♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, it'll probably be the last major war too before the world ends.
2006-06-12 01:24:40 · answer #7 · answered by Ark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its already been going. Nobody says anything about what Bush is doing. It so bad that people are coming on here saying they were treated very badly overseas because of Bush's war! Everybody hates us! DUHHHHH , I wonder why? This is going to be untold terrorism forever with the middle east! It is already here my dear.
2006-06-12 01:27:04 · answer #8 · answered by soniaatcalifornia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately yes, but I think that it will be between 3 areas, and over religion.I would bet that China, Russia, and North, and South America on one side, Africa,the middle east,India,and the south China Sea nations, on one side, and Europe caught in the middle again.
2006-06-12 01:29:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why not we had 1st and 2nd edition of world wars why not the 3rd edition. we have to keep the killing machine going strong dont we
2006-06-12 01:32:08 · answer #10 · answered by fartman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋