Why or why not?
2006-06-11 16:10:13 · 25 answers · asked by oaksterdamhippiechick 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe he would address the most urgent of all issues, which is the environment. If you have not seen his new movie, it is a startling reminder of how we are destroying the world. However he has said he would not run several different times, and why should he. The mudslinging is ridiculous in these the modern ages of political times, where anyone can make news out of nothing.
2006-06-11 17:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by se_roddy 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Al NEVER SAID he invented the Internet, this is yet another LIE by conservatives,,, Republicans love to make up lies and try to change history,,, but if your SMART,,, you will read the facts,,, because Americans are sick and tired of REPUBLICAN LIARS, GWB,,and the "good ole boys" of the GOP,, and are not going to take it anymore,,,so find a new stick
Don't count out Al Gore in 2008 if he decides to run for president
2006-06-11 23:28:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I cannot forgive him for going to Saudi Arabia and down talking Bush by saying how he was mistreating arabs. The Saudis do not vote here and there was no other purpose in doing that except to cause even more animosity to the US.
If he had made his comments here, I could over look them as trying to sway the public opinion. But this shows he let politics overshadow good judgment so therefore, not a candidate in my mind for the highest office of the land.
2006-06-11 23:29:20 · answer #3 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore wont run right now it looks like hillary clinton will be the democrat
2006-06-11 23:32:50 · answer #4 · answered by anonymous 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He whimped out and let Bush have the White House, even though Gore clearly won the election.
2006-06-11 23:16:42 · answer #5 · answered by ~j~ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. I think Mr. Gore is a bit looney. He's come off as a sore loser and no one needs to see him french kissing Tipper on stage.
2006-06-11 23:14:05 · answer #6 · answered by chamcham 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm waiting for him to re-invent himself once, or twice again, before I decide. But so far, he doesn't get my vote. He's too driven by polls and doesn't seem to know what he should be (politically).
His "No controlling legal authority" answer to the fund raising scandal was too "Clintonian" for me.
But...he did invent the Internet, so maybe he's o.k.
2006-06-11 23:15:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but as a republican I'm asking you to please pick him, Hillary, or any of the similiar candidates I've heard so far. It'd be real nice to have the election handed to us on a silver platter, AGAIN, because democrats can't bring their party (not just their candidate) back to the center.
2006-06-11 23:43:16 · answer #8 · answered by djack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He could not even win his own home state in the 2000 election.
2006-06-11 23:16:03 · answer #9 · answered by distill80 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO< NO
2006-06-11 23:15:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Moon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋