2006-06-11 12:50:23 · 21 answers · asked by elvishtattoo 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Yes I do, I think it is a wonderful thing to do for charity. Paparazzi is going to hound them till there is a picture so why not do something to help others?
Props for Angelina and Brad!
2006-06-11 13:01:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'll probably be labeled old-fashioned but I don't think there should have been a baby in the first place. Does being married mean anything at all and ok if BP's marriage wasn't working for him anymore there should be no pregnancy until after the divorce. Supposedly the money from the pictures is being given to charity. What wonderful role models this poor precious baby has.
2006-06-11 21:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she into giving money to charity . For one being a celebrity, sooner or later she's gonna chase down by papparazi. This way at least she and brad have the control over how the picture taken . On top of that donate the hugh amount of money to poverty stricken countries is a great course. Besdies, baby change quickly as she grows...no harm done....
2006-06-11 20:48:45 · answer #3 · answered by sstooc2001 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if they were selling for profit then no, but they gave it to charity. we all know that the paparazzi would have been dying to get a photo. i think they did it quite well. they aren't the only celebrity couple to have done this, paltrow, roberts, they all have did this in the past. shiloh just received the highest amount.
2006-06-11 19:55:38 · answer #4 · answered by rita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's very clever of them to do it. Some paparazzi would have managed to take a pic one day, anyway. So, instead on someone cashing on THEIR baby, they give the money to a charity. I don't see what's wrong with that!
2006-06-11 20:09:35 · answer #5 · answered by Offkey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, thanks for spelling her name right. And second, I figure, the baby is going to get its picture take eventually, no matter what they do, so I actually think its better that she sell the pic, especially since she is giving the money to charity.
2006-06-11 19:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by mo-z 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it is ok because she is giving the money she gets from the pictures to charity instead of using the millions she is getting for her own personal gain.
2006-06-11 19:54:27 · answer #7 · answered by life 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. the paparazzi is hounding them for pictures why not sell them. those magazines will pay that much so why not it goes to children that need it. i think they did the right thing.
2006-06-11 19:56:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since it's her daughter she does anything she wants with her pictures...
2006-06-11 19:58:10 · answer #9 · answered by O.D. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it seems like she is taking anavtage on a poor little child
2006-06-11 19:53:59 · answer #10 · answered by Jonas Brothers Loverrr! <33 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋