Al-Queada had already side lined Zarqawi because he was a liability...
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2B8B878B-D862-4056-B677-E600549C2738.htm
The behavour of Zarqawi was very unpopular in Iraq and as a foriegn born fighter he was aleinaliting ordinary Iraqies from the cause..and turning them against Al Queada..
The leader in Al-Queada wanted to get rid of Zarqawi for that reason..now the American have done the dirty work!!!
Al-Queada has a new Iraqi born figure head to lead operations in Iraq...
who won't make any mistakes like bombing Muslims in a mosque..or bombing people in a country with many Al-queada supporters such as Jordan...
Ordinary Iraqies will now feel inclined to help Al-Queada again
and concentrate on killing American soldiers...
Whilst Al-Queada world wide can concentrate on kiiling infidels everywhere...
And the Americans didn't even capture Zarqawi alive...so that they could get information from him....
2006-06-11
10:53:36
·
11 answers
·
asked by
NONAME
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well done Americans...you really have combated terrorism with this one..NOT!!!
Didn't you even think to question the bastarx... He might have been able to give you useful information..to catch other Al -Queada members..and actually stop the terrorism
2006-06-11
10:56:39 ·
update #1
In a letter to Zarqawi, head of the network branch in Iraq, intercepted by US authorities in October 2005, Al Qaeda No 2 Zawahiri, chided him for indiscriminate killings because that risked alienating Sunni Arabs. In the absence of this popular support, Zawahiri wrote, “the jihadist movement would be crushed in the shadows.”
Events are turning against Zarqawi and company. The Zarqawi network has become a liability to Sunni tribes who suffer economically, feel marginalised politically, and resent being lumped together with Al Qaeda. They want to participate in political and economic reconstruction of the country and set their own agenda
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=ZARQAWI+LIABILITY&btnG=Search&meta=
2006-06-11
11:14:12 ·
update #2
Stop sitting at home and speculating war tactics.
Go enlist and fight in the war, if you really got guts
2006-06-11 10:56:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by jubda 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sorry, but you are factually inaccurate in many of your points.
Zarqawi was the acknowledged leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, and has been praised on several occasions by Bin Laden (both in video and on two audio tapes).
He was a Sunni Muslim, where as the majority of people in Iraq as Shia Muslims, which Al Qaeda see as "non-followers" of the true Islamic faith. This is why his followers were targeting Shia Mosques.
Bin Laden is a Saudi, yet is seen as a hero to many Muslim fanatics in Iraq. Zarqawi was viewed in the same manner - the fact that he was from Jordan made no difference. He was fighting for the Muslim cause in Iraq.
There was very little tactical value in capturing Zarqawi as he had no contact with Bin Laden or the Al Qaeda hierarchy and was working in isolation.
Al Qaeda wants everyone converted to Islamic faith (except Jews who they want to kill as per the instructions in the Qu'ran), but they only support the Sunni faith and as such Shia Muslims are also under threat from them.
Therefore the killings will continue, as will the bombing of Shia Mosques.
2006-06-11 18:06:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by cavinue 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you are underestimating the skills Zarqawi had. He was a charismatic leader and well-trained tactition. Yeah, some other new guys will step into the void he (and the others killed in the bombing) left, but they won't be as good, at least not initially. His death is still a blow to Al Qaeda.
2006-06-12 16:39:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by foreoki12 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope we can do them many more such favors
We can help with Usama, and his other leaders too.
Got a lot more bombs to favor them all with
How about doing them a favor with al jazeera too -
I think the building would like the renovation
And maybe favor them at Mecca and Medina
YES ___LOTS OF FAVORS
Thank You - GREAT IDEA
2006-06-11 18:09:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dan W 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Organisations like Al-Queada will always have a leader as long as the organisation exists.
The organisation will exist as long as there is an occupation at least.
Leaders will always be targets.
2006-06-11 18:12:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by jimbo_thedude 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our plan is to continue doing them favors of this nature. They should be ecstatic to learn that we will kill all Al-Qaeda leaders.
2006-06-11 18:29:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by MorgantonNC 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like you think you have inside info...are you waiting for your turn at the Virgins? Or, are you some sorry sniveling little mole? What is an ordinary "Iraqie?" Are these the people who are flashed a card: INHALE.........(next card) EXHALE!
...touche! robertonduty!
...thanks for the info cavinue -- he needed that!
2006-06-11 18:04:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's not a good idea to generalize citizens of a certain country like that.
2006-06-11 17:57:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sydney 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you retarted? Yes, killing a terorist leader is a bad thing....(heyy look a flying monkey)
2006-06-11 17:59:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by elvin_9203 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is my sincere wish to keep doin Al-Queda those kinds of favors.
2006-06-11 17:59:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by robertonduty 5
·
0⤊
0⤋