the saturn costs $2500.00. which is a better car or a better deal.
2006-06-11 09:08:11 · 7 answers · asked by the man 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Chrysler
I think that I would favor the Saturn, I was hunting for a transmission for a Cirrus and noticed that everyone that I found was burned up. The Stratus is the same car and I found them in the same condition.
Good Luck
2006-06-12 23:09:44 · answer #1 · answered by NEWBEE1 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I'd get either of those cars. A slightly newer saturn would be a better car than a 99, and I don't think a cirrus is going to have very good reliability issues. Six grand for a 6 year old car seems kinda high anyway. Maybe for 4 grand, it would be ok.
2006-06-15 15:59:28 · answer #2 · answered by sethle99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever you do don't buy the Saturn!
If you Pony up an extra $6,000 ($12,000 total) you can get a 2005 Chrysler Sebring with about 15,000mi on it and a 8yr/80,000mi warranty(roadside assistance included). Remember this: When it comes to cars, you truly get what you pay for.
2006-06-17 18:06:37 · answer #3 · answered by Cole M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the chrysler....I have a 2000 sebring that is quite reliable. A saturn I had in previous yrs was garbage...but thats personal opinion...look up some valid tech spech and see what would be most appropriate for you. The milege of the saturn is also a turn off and that is why it is cheaper.
2006-06-13 09:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by Jessica J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buy the saturn, the miles are way to high for $6,000. on other car.
Look for a car with low miles, save money and ride longer.
2006-06-11 16:16:10 · answer #5 · answered by artistjohnfanning 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i owned a saturn and it was a piece of crap, i now own a cirrus and i love it
2006-06-11 16:12:37 · answer #6 · answered by spoiled44622 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would get the crystler less miles
2006-06-16 17:03:14 · answer #7 · answered by mopargrl73 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋