English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

What ever floats their boat

2006-06-11 07:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 1 1

They wanted the privacy and they made the right choice as they got it. As for Just M's comment about there being better doctors in the States, you are so ignorant. Dr Chris Barnard performed the first heart transplant in South Africa, this was when Namibia was still part of South Africa so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

2006-06-11 22:09:59 · answer #2 · answered by MissBehave 5 · 0 0

I think its great cos they got their privacy during the birth and Namibia has got to be a really relaxing place and I understand the people were brilliant with them. Good on them both!

2006-06-11 07:58:39 · answer #3 · answered by greekbabe 2 · 0 0

Ithink we should stop hassling them and let them go wherever they want to go and where they think was the best place for the birth.I kinda agreed with them as they get away from the whole celebrity thing and the paparazzi as with the whole Britney and her baby thing.

2006-06-11 23:42:06 · answer #4 · answered by outer 2 · 0 0

No opinions really. Not something I'd do personally, though, I'd want to be in a first world country with top class medical facilities 'just in case'. Don't get me wrong, I know they didn't give birth in a tent.

2006-06-11 07:54:50 · answer #5 · answered by Quackles 4 · 0 0

I personally would have stayed in the United States to have my baby. They have better doctors and specialist here.

2006-06-11 07:54:21 · answer #6 · answered by just m 3 · 0 0

Good thing they could get away for some privacy for this. They may have put themselves in the public eye but their kid should be born in peace.

2006-06-11 16:42:26 · answer #7 · answered by elvitatruth 2 · 0 0

If they wanted to go to Africa to have their baby it is up to them.

2006-06-11 11:25:23 · answer #8 · answered by butterfly55freedom 4 · 0 0

i think they would have been better staying in the us. They would have got better healthcare there what if there were complications with the birth? personally i wouldn't have risked it. But it was their decision i'm just glad it all went well.

2006-06-12 03:01:44 · answer #9 · answered by sooziebaby 2 · 0 0

It's up to them isn't it what they do. though persoanlly I would be a little hesitant about it, what with the AIDS epidemic, you have to be very careful and bring you own equipment etc. x

2006-06-11 21:53:55 · answer #10 · answered by Little minx 5 · 0 0

I think that it was fine, if that's where they wanted to have their baby then I am happy for them. Maybe having their baby there meant something to them.

2006-06-11 08:09:54 · answer #11 · answered by blessed_in07 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers