Yes, I read it. I thought it was a good tale and it took a couple of days to read.
I probably could have gone thought it quicker, except I kept looking up stuff on the Internet and at the local library as I read the book. It does make a big difference, for example, if you can look at a picture of the "Last Supper" when th book is talking about the painting. There are many other examples where this extra info helped.
2006-06-11 03:18:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Richard 7
·
57⤊
0⤋
Just finished it this morning in total took me a week off and on. I liked the book and will probably read Angels and Demons by Dan Brown. My brother read both and considers Angels and Demons a better read. I didn't see the movie version yet and don't know if I will. For the most part I have been disappointed with movies made from books I read.
2006-06-11 12:34:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by rogue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I have read it. I started it fairly late at night, read about half of it, then finished it the next morning when I got up, so it probably took me 6 or 7 hours to read it. I thought it was okay. There were parts I really liked, but there were parts that were pretty predictable, and I prefer to be completely surprised by a book.
2006-06-11 23:02:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bronwen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read a couple of years ago. I think it took me 4 to 5 days to read. The beginning was really intriguing, but the book drags a bit in the end. I liked it... I really got into it... it draws you in.. but as I said it's a bit endless... also there are some very long passages of history which sometimes bored me.
2006-06-11 18:04:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by WiTcH 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read it and it's one of the best books, other than the um, sensual parts in it. It took me 2 weeks but I was in school and had 4 projects going on at the same time so I didn't have much time to read it.
2006-06-11 11:28:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by YoungPoet 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read it in probably four hours, on and off. It was an interesting concept and paced well, but after a while I got fed up with how easily Langdon and Sophie figured out clues and stuff. Seriously, the author could have made them sweat a little for it.
2006-06-11 08:06:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked the book a lot. It's a good mystery story. It took me 3 days to read it but I was on vacation so I could devote the time.
2006-06-11 08:06:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sully 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I go through books like a cop with donuts so it didn't take me long at all. Each chapter is pretty short, and the pace is quick. I liked it and read it in 2 days.
2006-06-11 08:28:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah I read it. I thought it was an excellent book. Took me 3-4 days to finish it.
2006-06-11 08:04:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by brand_new_monkey 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It took me about 2 weeks, but that was only because I had to work in between there. But it is worth all the time in the world!
2006-06-11 11:55:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by otter7 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have read the Prequel first to understand it properly
A few days for both books
2006-06-11 08:05:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Robert B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋