Do you think Bush would have gone to war, without uk backing him.?

Question

Or Blair to hold his hand.

Answer 1

Bush won't dare to face his enemy alone. Only after UK and Australia agreed, he started invading Iraq. Now the Americans, Australians and Britons are confused. Where is the WMD? It's now proven that Bush, Blair and Howard are the greatest liars of this century. A beautiful country like Iraq has been destroyed. And the worse is they have created the so-called terrorists/liberators.

Answer 2

Yes hes nuts, hes determined but does not have enough guts to do what needs to be done, the world knows of the heap of nukes in Iran, and the terrorist capital to be Iran but he does not have the courage to attack Iran becuase of the precious oil and consequnces from other muslim oil countries, so Iraq is good, bad guy Saddam would fit so perfectly into his saving the world role, which in a way is good, Saddam was bad but hello there is more to be end to actually achieve what he set out to do. So there are nothing but empty gongs

Answer 3

of course
blairs ego was part of the plan
but bush needed a fool to share the costs with
in return for some crumbs of the table and a questionable entry
in the history books
alsao the army cover of a large space in iraq
the americans do not have enough forces cover their own territory in wartimes

Answer 4

Wow good question.....I dont think he would of risked the embarrassment of them not going along with him unless he knew beforehand if they would or wouldnt back him up. Personally if you cant count on your best friends, who can you really count on. By the way you aussies are the best thank you so much. We wont forget. Canada? Go screw yourself. Im all for lowering your flag where ever it flies next to ours here in the USA.

Answer 5

can you eat cake without frosting of course .the world knew allah ben laden stepped over the line .and the he was going to get his butt kicked and the us would do it france germany and most of the pimps in europe was selling out their people for money and did not want to stop the flow of cash the un was bought and paid for .i feel if the us would have went in alone would have bombed more sent less soldiers and baghdad would glow at night

Answer 6

Bush doesn't care about approval ratings of the US, nor the rest of the world. He would have done it with no support at all just because he can.

Answer 7

Dont forget Australia backing him too as Australia was first to join war with USA

Answer 8

bush does not need any help just did it because of the idiots(Kerry,Clinton,and Kennedy)we have the resources to prosecute this alone and would be easier than with a coalition

Answer 9

Yes, he wanted Sadam from the get go no matter what it took. Bin Laden just made it easier for him to make the excuses.

Answer 10

there was absolutley no qestion that tony blair would back george bush, they are both corrupt puppets of the illuminati, and the new world order.

http://www.infowars.com/

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/index.html

http://www.threeworldwars.com/