Should iranians have nuclear energy ?

Answer 1

Not at all.

Answer 2

Any answer would be a paradox or it would be biased.But ,since you have asked specifically about "Nuclear Energy" ,yes ,why not?Till they enrich it ( uranium) excessively.Till they enrich it only 3% to 5% which is necessary for reactors and not upto 90% necessary for weaponry.The perfect answer would be to supervise the enrichment of uranium in Iraq through a team of officials formed by either the IAEA or UN.After all, how can the world trust a nation which is the literally the birthplace of modern terrorism and also what if a second Ayatollah Khomeini seizes power?Israel, Iran's no.1 enemy is located in the region and is well within the reach of Iran's missiles.A point to be noted.And this could be a beginning of a new arms race.(Remember , one of the indirect issues which led to World War I was the European arms race)
However,looking at this issue through the Iranian viewpoint.Every country may possess the nuclear energy facility for sake of overcoming power deficits.Concerning the nuclear weaponry issue through the Iranian Viewpint ,no other nation than USA has used the nuclear weaponry during a war for whatever reason.And a nation like India which is involoved in a major war and tensions with Pakistan possesses nuclear weaponry.So,it is an issue which will have no problems till the enrichment is specifically for the sake of Nuclear Weaponry.So it is a very complicated issue which can lead to immense pressure on the International Diplomatic Relations.Besides,these are the creations of the Ego-struggles between nations which we have to tackle now.

Answer 3

Having nuclear energy is no problem. It is what they want to do with the plutonium that is the problem. If they have nuclear weapons then there could be a problem. On the other had there are several nations that do have those weapons so why should Iran not be allowed to have them. I do hope the situation is solved and Iran does not pursue the weapons side of it. Actually if they really want them they have enough money to buy the technology to do so.

Answer 4

H*ll no!

Their government is run by a totalitarian bunch of bearded Muslim retards who have no respect for human rights and want us all to return to the dark ages.

Then there is the Prime minister over there Amadinajad in the middle of this international crisis over Iran's nuclear program he vows to destroy Israel.
Well Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and their only hope might be to nuke the Iran while they still have the chance.

Another Issue is that Iran had agreed not to develop nuclear weapons to the UN security council and did so anyway.

I know a lot of you hate the US. but China Russia
Europe and many other countries are calling for them to stop as well.

Answer 5

I think they should, nobody should be denied the right to develop technology. But for safety reasons I would limit the latter in that way that the fuel for their nuclear plants should be controlled by the Russians.

Iran is a superpower in an instable region. If it's denied access to technology and thus prevented to develop like normal countries then that's going to make some people angry... If the fuel for nuclear energy is controlled by Russia, the Iran can further develop itself to a modern country and the West can feel safe.

Answer 6

If the Americans have it why can't the Iranians? So what if Iran is ruled by a religious fanatic, George Bush doesn't seem like a devout atheist now does he!

I wish the Americans would stop assuming that the rest of the world is as warlike as they (and their good mate Israel) are.

Answer 7

Energy Yes Weapons NO

Answer 8

with any luck by no ability. If anybody believes they could be using nuclear potential howls on the moon and chases canines. Iran is an fairly corrupt united states (oppressive, etc.) led by radical Muslims. Why might anybody help them having nuclear weapons; Muslims do -- and that's a fact. they might obliterate Israel if given the pass forward. Israel isn't any possibility to Iran; it is any incorrect way around, Iran is conceivable to Israel as maximum properly recommended human beings comprehend. remember what Ahmendinejad (spelling?) mentioned approximately blowing Israel off the map etc.

Answer 9

Should the Iranian government be permitted to have anything? No.

A dictatorship isn't a legitimate state of existence (to rule men by brutal force, threaten to wipe countries off of the map... doesn't become valid merely because you hold territorial boundaries).

Answer 10

Absolutley, but it should be controlled and monitored by NATO. As should all countries of the world including the USA. It should be overseen with a system of checks and balances as any good government is run. To ensure availibility at the lowest possible cost. AS for magpies19 comment please know that the president of Iran has called for the total inialation of Isreal and that it is his belief that he was born to innitiate Jihad and to falicitate the return of Allah. Put that in your peace pipe and smoke it!

Answer 11

I think every country has a right to decide for themselves....no one can stop that. but the issue is whether that country would be able to act responsibly with that power acquired is the question in hand...for which the rest of the world should get a comfort at....and what Iran has to do right now is get provide that comfort level.