Not at all. Once you start down that slope of censoring speech, there is no way to stop it.
2006-06-10 21:39:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by James 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think pornography is as old as humans are, though definitions have changesd as it has gotten more graphic!
No pornography should not be illegal unless it has depictions that are against the law. Child Pornography for instance. Or against the law for someone under 18.
Sex is a normal part of life, thats why you have some hormones,, as is death. Why do you want to hide them so much?
Some of the words to Rap songs are more offensive to me. Have you seen some of the video's on MTV?
After you take away pornography, what will you take next? The Sears Catalog?
2006-06-10 21:52:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.Of course.Pornography causes men to look upon women or women to look upon men as "Sex-objects".The human-feeling is lost and is only a way for sexists to fulfill their carnal desires.It is a way to shred the moral fabric to pieces .We have to have boundaries .It encourages sex-slavery ,sexual bondage,children are kidnapped and used as sex-objects.But he point to be made is that do you really think making a thing illegal is going to make any difference.Our society is like a child .If it's asked not to do something ,you can expect it to try to do it more and more.As for censorship,there's a difference between Liberalism,And Sexism and free -speech.People tend to forget that for whatever reason.
2006-06-11 00:20:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by psi12121212 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consenting adults should have the freedom to enjoy what they want! If there is not a market for something it will not be produced. If there is a demand, be it legal or not, there will be a way that the demand is filled.
2006-06-10 21:43:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by fire4511 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree with this because it is our right to see anything we choose. If we were to stop people from producing and purchasing this, then I guess we should prohibit violent movies as well, right?
2006-06-10 21:48:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by brookaking 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. It's like anything else, only the weak will be manipulated by it. Besides, churches do way more harm than naked women do.
2006-06-10 21:43:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by DocGonzo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ever hear of the first amendment? If it starts there where does it end?
2006-06-11 00:41:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by ecleeze 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disagree. No one should tell another what their morals should be, if you don't like it,stay away and MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS!
2006-06-10 21:44:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by MC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you'd just make it more enticing.
2006-06-10 21:46:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
0⤋