I think that a surrogate mom is a great thing. What does it matter if she carries a baby for someone else. What do you care about more? Who has the baby, or who loves the baby?
2006-06-10 16:39:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by thewildeman2 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah, why not? if a woman cant conceive on her own, and science can fix this problem as long as they plant the fetus in another woman, whats wrong with another woman being kind enough to do it for her?
2006-06-10 23:40:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by tanja_berengue 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that it is a valid choice and that it can be quite noble. I think that it does represent a legal grey area, e.g. if the surrogate mother becomes attached to the baby and does not want to relinquish, the law may be unclear about who has the right to keep the child.
2006-06-11 08:07:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by agentofchaos 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, especially for Woman who can't conceive or carry to full term.
2006-06-10 23:36:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by julia4evert 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, some women are unable to carry children for themselves and it would be a good option for them. However, the woman carrying the child may become attached... I dunno..
2006-06-10 23:36:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by xdannifenx 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a woman does with her uterus is up to her and nobody else.
2006-06-10 23:35:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Not Allie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the woman is willing sure. why not?
2006-06-10 23:57:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by bettyboop 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't think it is right however for people who cannot have a baby then it is their only choice besides adoption ...
2006-06-10 23:36:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Taylor G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
my opion .. no...
2006-06-10 23:35:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by the_silverfoxx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋