People are never justified in breaking the law in that it will ultimatly lead to anarchy. What are some reasons for this?
2006-06-10 15:08:38 · 4 answers · asked by ixhearttxy0u 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Breaking the law doesn't lead to anarchy!
Having no laws to break...THAT'S anarchy.
2006-06-10 15:11:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you misstated... it's not breaking the law that leads to anarchy ... it's breaking the law then not getting punished for it even when caught. Anarchy is basically a social structure where each person/family governs themselves with no system of being held accountable.
In my opinion, this country at the higher levels are already anarchists. Take for example, the Iraqi war. Bush goes over there for reasons that turn out to be untrue.. flat false. Proceeds to kill 100,000s of ppl then when 100% evidence says... hey Iraq had nothing to do with 911, did not have WMDs, and flat out the ppl never ask to be liberated. Yet for some reason, there seems to be no accountability.
Additionally, we celebrate the murder without a trial of high ranking insurgents. Well I tell you this.. if this country was occupied by a power so great that we lost at an out-right war, would we just give up our way of life or create our own insurgents? My pt is they are defending their country in the only manner they can, as defending an unjustifiable occupation they should.
I know that if I went out and decided to burn down my neighbor's house convinced he was a threat to me. Then when the police found no weapons in his house or anything proving I was defending myself, I'd be in jail.
2006-06-10 22:25:28 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If one person does it and gets away with it, others may do the same and society gets out of control very quickly
2006-06-10 22:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by sticky 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it leads to Judas Priest.
2006-06-10 22:10:52 · answer #4 · answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋