Who cares if some terrorist starves himself?
2006-06-10 13:00:37 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
It's like a child holding his breath until he gets what he wants. But neither method works. When the child holds his breath long enough, he passes out and then he breathes. The terrorist stops eating until he dies. So the problem is solved either way in both situations.
2006-06-10 13:09:48 · answer #1 · answered by NannyMcPhee 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ok #1 it's not only terrorist's that do that
#2 It is to prove a point that you are willing to starve yourself for your own belief. If you do die then the person who was disagreeing has to deal the fact that is was their fault who made the people starve themselfs.
2006-06-10 13:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by Tho Deep ught 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ghandi did a hunger strike, so did Bobby Sands...
the point is to rally some sympathy for them. Johnny Public says, "the government isn't that mean, they won't actually let them die." so the public pressures the government to give in.
2006-06-10 13:06:03 · answer #3 · answered by cirque de lune 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, I don't really see the point in a hunger strike. Do they hope someone will feel sorry for them and give in to their demands or what?
2006-06-10 13:04:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one that I know. But then, I don't know that many people. They can all starve as far as I am concerned.
2006-06-10 13:04:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i m hungry rite now and i have scored 128 points.so its very beneficial to be hungry.
LOL.
2006-06-10 13:07:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to show how stupid one is
2006-06-10 13:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by wolfman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋