They made a very thorough and convincing documentary about 911 being an inside job. I realize that this can be shocking news to people who have not been exposed to the vast amount of evidence that leads to this conclusion. Please before sending me back a knee-jerk answer, at least look into it a little for yourself. This is a great site to start with:
http://universalseed.org/
You can see Loose Change 2 for yourself there, as well as lectures and evidence from physicists, scientists, firemen, policemen, eyewitnesses and theologins. The amount of evidence that has been gathered that the trade center buildings 1,2 and 7 "collapsing" was actually a case of controlled demolition is staggering. The presentations by Dr. David Ray Griffin are especially convincing.
I realize that this is an "unthinkable" act by own own government. It is so severe an act that people simply will not even consider the evidence, do so at your own peril. Get this information while it is still available!
2006-06-10 08:01:03 · 4 answers · asked by getkeef 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The lawsuit is not being done to shut down the information for conspiracy buffs. It is a copyright infringement suit which some french guys apparently had something that loose change 2 used.
Google is going to stop allowing the viewing and/or download because it is ILLEGAL to present someone else's work as your own and profit from it.
The lawsuit is too new to have any developments at this point.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/911_documentary_removed/
2006-06-10 09:47:09 · answer #1 · answered by grim reaper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What lawsuit? I haven't heard of a lawsuit - by who?
Thanks for that website - I haven't seen it yet.
And yes, there are too many anamolies with 911. The official US story is significantly and definitely false. I don't know who knew what or is responsible, but it is not as simple as old Cheney and Bush tell us.
2006-06-10 08:14:47 · answer #2 · answered by lip11 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can there be any law suit against this informative video? There is not one bit of falsehood about it, and therefore cannot be slander. I imagine that any law suit brought up, would surely be dismissed as of no basis for a law suit.
2006-06-10 08:11:46 · answer #3 · answered by se_roddy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I am glad in a way b/c maybe this tape will get more exposure that way and we can get some answers hopefully.
2006-06-10 13:41:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋