Republicans don't have any idea that other people actually have minds of their own and don't think the same way that they do... when you say no, they think "oh she couldn't be telling me, a Republican no"...
they don't listen to anyone but Rush
as to your other problem...
... you should just report Freetyme... he's clearly not even attempting to answer your question, which is a violation of board rules... just click on report abuse under his name and report him for not answering the question...
If you did it for all the times he didn't answer your question... he would probably get kicked off...
2006-06-10 08:31:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
8⤋
Sorry, I have no explanation as to why those specific men haven't accepted your refusal. Perhaps stating it in a way that doesn't sound so sarcastic, would help.
I'd have to assume from your question, that you're against the war. On the most basic level, every war is a failure of two sides to come to a consensus. If the two sides have no communication with each other, it's very unlikely for them to form a consensus. When either side refuses to listen to the other, then follows up with a sweeping insult, tensions will undoubtedly rise. That, Bunchik, is how wars get started.
2006-06-10 23:12:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thisisnotmyrealname 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm...let's see...the US Constitution defines treason in Article III, Section 3 as follows:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
These days, those enemies are Al-Qaeda, Islamic terrorists, and those affiliated with them. So, tell me, which of these acts were your suitors commiting? 'Cause you see, voting for a President you don't like doesn't make someone a traitor. Come to think of it, I haven't seen many Republicans - or ANY Republicans for that matter - taking the side of militant Islam against America. I HAVE seen quite a few left-wingers do so though...
In conclusion, in order to learn the proper definition and usage of certain words, I recommend hitting the books more and the bar less. But that's just me.
P.S. You're right about one thing - those Republican guys who continue to chase you around clearly don't get it. They don't realize that there are so many other, smarter women out there.
2006-06-10 18:53:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be careful not to conclude causation from mere correlation. Most men are naturally competitive regardless of their political affiliation. The reason why you’re noticing the persistence of Republicans is because they are the ones you're rejecting. If you began doing the same thing to Democrat men, you would find that this persistence is a characteristic of men in general. It has nothing to do with political affiliation.
Judging by your commentary, you’re so politically biased that you probably won’t even consider my answer, but I’ll continue just in case. It’s true that Republicans don’t do everything right, but neither do Democrats. Rather than blindly following either, you ought to develop the habit of thinking critically about issues. It would behoove you to do a little introspection, and to realize that you’ve developed many of the characteristics that you hate about Republicans.
How can you reasonably determine your opinion of someone before you’ve had a chance to learn about their beliefs? Just as there are a range of Democrats, there are a range of Republicans. You may find that you have more in common with a moderate Republican than you do with an extremist Democrat. At the very least you could engage in discourse that may lead you to consider other points of view. Unfortunately, like many Republicans, you’ve blindly sworn your allegiance to your own political party, and you readily adopt whatever position the leaders of your party advocate. This type of dogmatic thinking is exactly what leads people to many irrational behaviors, including racism and terrorism.
As a final note, I’d like you to know that part of me would like to meet you. From your commentary and prose, I can tell that you aren’t very bright, but given that other men are so interested, you must be either exceptionally beautiful or filthy rich. I could help you develop critical thinking skills and then you’d be quite a catch.
Oh, by the way, I can offer another explanation for why these guys may not "get it". Your English is atrocious. They may not understand you at all. I clicked through a few of your other answers and noticed that you have repeatedly attacked people for their poor language skills. Do you know what irony is?
Answerman:
I voted for Bush; incidentally, I also voted for Clinton. In any event, I take exception to your remark that those who voted for Bush don’t have the mental capacity to challenge you. Forgive my arrogance, but are you being facetious? I’d be more than willing to challenge you. What measure of mental capacity shall we use? Your commentary indicates that you write with the proficiency one would expect from a 6th grader. I’m sure you wouldn’t like to use that as a measure. Would you prefer to use our respective IQs? I honestly hope to hear from you soon. As it stands, casual readers with a basic command of the English language will enjoy a good laugh at your expense.
2006-06-11 03:52:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by codemap 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It’s a shame that these people you refer to as “traitors” have complimented you in such a way to ask for the pleasure of your company. At least after their hearing the word “no”, they haven’t followed up with unwanted physical advances like our former president extended to Kathleen Willy and Juanita Broderick.
If they were behaving like imbeciles, that is reason enough to not give them the time of day. If they are kind and want to visit, perhaps if you are as correct in your thinking as you seem to believe, you may be able to give them some of your wisdom and enlightenment; that is unless you can’t formulate an idea beyond name calling. Maybe you will find that the aisle that divides our political leaders in Washington doesn’t mean we have to be uncivil to each other.
If you still don’t want to associate with these people who are so beneath you, then be flattered by their request, say no, and leave it at that. To accuse them of treason because you disagree with their freedom to hold an opinion that may not be in line with your all-sovereign ideology, you may be placing yourself on a pedestal you can not balance.
2006-06-10 15:17:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by George_Bailey 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does your decision not to date people on the political left (you did say traitors correct) who hate the USA have to do with not dating people who voted for Bush? If you don't date Bush supporters and you don't date traitors (people on the political left who hate the USA) then you don't date much do you? Actually there is a large portion of the population that doesn't vote so it is not as bad as it seems.
2006-06-10 15:06:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by cashcobra_99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you give me the definition of a bigot? You seem imminently well qualified to answer that question.
bunchik Post
Dick Cheney is convicted of yet another hunting accident of where he shot his lesbian daughter in the face because she stomped her cute little foot and said...Daddy, I want to marry my lesbo lover and you are to pay for mah fancy wedding.
bunchik Post
Duh...if Monkey Boy (BUSH) ever had a REAL
women he'd have NO idea of WHAT to do...
for he prefers men himself (Jeffy Gannon has
FREE ACCESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE...he's a professional
gay male prostitute who visits Bush ALOT....)
When will Bush come out & tell his sheeple he's gay?
bunchik Post
How on earth did a $200/hour gay male prostitute get past post-9/11 White House security nearly every day for two years to get within spitball distance of George W. Bush?
bunchik Post
Mr. President, did you have sex with that man? Bush has never had much of a poker face. He's easy to read... like when he was in the classroom getting the news that the World Trade Center had been attacked for the 2nd time... you could tell he knew exactly what was going on... well, in these photos, it looks like there's a little something going on with these two gays.
http://www.bartcop.com/gannon-bush.jpg.....
Hmmmm...Bush hugs Gay Jeff but refuses to hug Kathy Harris!
2006-06-10 15:01:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by freetyme813 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm with you sister, anybody that voted for Bush doesn't have the mental capacity to challenge me. I damn sure don't need to dumb down their level, just to try to have a good time. There are to many intelligent girls on the planet to dance with an idiot. As for words to use, you might ask them their definition of the word no. It is probably complicated but if they do by chance have an anwer you can tell them that and they might understand. I said might.
2006-06-10 15:04:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thought you did not date traitors, have you looked lately at what the democrats are far, they use people like Mike Moore who use false info in a movie ( getting sued big time for that now)
The republicians are the only ones really protecting the US, God help us if Kerry was in, he may have surrendered to Iraq by now.
2006-06-10 15:03:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I was a Republican man, I'm not sure I would want to date you either.
Maybe you should try to get a date with Michael Moore.....as the old saying goes, "Birds of a feather, flock together..."
Grins,
A Republican Woman.
I really liked the CashCobra answer..... LOL !!
2006-06-10 15:22:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by MesquiteGal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their probably trying to get a rise out of you for calling them traitors without knowing anything about them except who they voted for.
2006-06-10 14:59:49
·
answer #11
·
answered by Incorrectly Political 5
·
0⤊
0⤋