English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-10 04:32:28 · 8 answers · asked by Question Monster 4 in Arts & Humanities History

8 answers

well the sun sets on their lands, but not on their people because the colonies of Australia, Canada, USA, south Africa..etc are still sons of Britain, not to mention that the queen of England is still the queen of much of the colonies.
Americans seem to be taking over now, how ever their expansion is not separating an American believe but a British one as the British have and had a huge influence on them and their culture. they would like to think we don't.
.
.
why do Irish hate us?:-(

2006-06-10 06:21:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The term originally referred to the fact that due to the rotation of the Earth and the distribution of the land it was always daylight somewhere in the Empire.

Discounting the Commonwealth, I understand that there are still sufficient British dependencies to justify the claim (for example the Falkland Islands).

So we can say "the sun never sets on". I'm not sure we can get away with using words like "Empire" though in Blair's Britain.

2006-06-10 17:47:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The sun never sets on the british Empire.
.
.
.
.
.
.Because God doesn't trust them in the dark ;-)
From an Irishman.

2006-06-10 12:31:24 · answer #3 · answered by zephyrescent 4 · 0 0

yes. The lands claimed by the UK are much fewer now.

2006-06-10 13:38:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

They no longer dominate the world.

2006-06-10 11:34:21 · answer #5 · answered by MojoMan 6 · 0 0

yes it does

2006-06-10 11:35:25 · answer #6 · answered by frenchie_for_you 2 · 0 0

like yeah

2006-06-10 12:33:13 · answer #7 · answered by Computer_problem maker 1 · 0 0

YES!!!

2006-06-10 12:04:58 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers