yes
2006-06-10 03:45:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by need2know 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
That's funny, you're conspiracy theory doesn't explain the Black Box that was found at the crash site along with the bodies that the clean up crews had to remove the crash site.
Oh, let me guess...that stuff was planted there AFTER the crash right?
"Pentagon Strike" implies that the eyewitnesses did not see American Airlines Flight 77. These eyewitness reports (from various media sources) were used selectively in this "film" to imply that they saw a missile - when the full quote clearly states they saw the plane.
Let's use the FULL transcript of the eye-witness interview rather than what "Pentagon Strike" edited:
Even funnier, Pentagon Strike superimposed quotes from eyewitnesses (some of them out of context) in a black stripe over a photo of the impact zone - the stripe obscures the view that shows the full extent of the damage caused by the plane.
Absolutely none of the hundreds of people who saw the events - reported seeing a missile hit the Pentagon. One bystander said that the plane acted as if it was a cruise missile, and some hoaxers twisted his words to pretend that he supposedly saw a missile - the opposite of what he actually said.
Thanks for the question though, Left Winger.
2006-06-10 10:52:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shep 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it didnt. A bunch of nuts made that video up, probably NON AMERICAN nuts. They have showed clear video tape on the news of an airplane hitting the pentagon, everyone has seen the CLEAR footage of 2 planes hitting the world trade center. Dont be an idiot. We all know who was flying the planes, Saudi Arabians. Does that explain why we are in Iraq? No. I will tell you why we are in Iraq. There were reports that many other countries including China and England agreed on that there were Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The US made a mistake and jumped the gun, when really there were no weapons of mass destruction to be found. Our government was trying to protect this country, would you feel better if it were true and they did nothing about it and all the major cities in this coutry were wiped clean by nuclear explosives? We are now in too deep in Iraq to leave them, as soon as they can support themselves and protect themselves from insurgents, the US troops will pull out.
2006-06-10 11:01:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by E 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only an idiot believes this stuff. Anyone can make up a bunch of baloney that has nothing to do with the facts. We have films of the planes hitting the buildings. We have tapes of people calling for help. We have confessions of those who committed the terrorism. And Bin Ladin took credit for the attacks. What more do you need?
2006-06-10 10:48:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No doubt
USA commit the act in order that they can blame muslim throughout the world, so they can intervene, invade and occupy other country. So they can dominate the world
Bonus : A hypothesis said that israel is the masterplan of the attack. So they can persuade US to declare war on israeli's rivals in the middle east
2006-06-10 10:50:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by arifin ceper 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dodnt know the answer to that question but orther people have said it as an excuse for george w bush war on the third world
2006-06-10 10:47:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by joey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they did...evidence shows a jet did not hit the Pentagon.....
2006-06-10 10:46:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by MC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows.
2006-06-10 11:10:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by will_jones_90 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
See also: isanyonemorestupidthanme?.com
2006-06-10 10:53:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
new world order
2006-06-10 10:47:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by easynow32778 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO
Al-queida did...how can yall think that of the government?!?!?!!
2006-06-10 14:39:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by Danielle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋