http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change
2006-06-10 03:12:06 · 10 answers · asked by safarlsun33 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes.
You would have to be naive enough to believe an unbelievable series of events involving 1,000's of people occurred in total secrecy.
What makes that tough is that we can't even keep a "war crime" of putting underwear on some scum bags head for 30 seconds on the other side of the planet a secret.
Sometimes logic is the easiest solution to most questions. It is always the easiest solution to absurdly ridiculous questions.
2006-06-10 03:21:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the most part, yes, though some generalities were proscribed, the surface treatment of the science involved is factually correct. As for the belief that it takes 1000's of people to pull this off, it actually takes just a handful (less than 100 or so competent agents and planners) to create the confusion and hundreds to cover up what they believe to be their own incompetence in a horrible accident instead of complicity. The fact that most of those in the government that screwed up the biggest on that day recieved big promotions instead of reprimands is a big indicator.
IF this were the case, Bush Jr. would most definitely not be the mastermind, but you can find the list of "believers in the New Pearl Harbor" on the PNAC website.
For the best raw science on the subject:
http://www.physics911.net
For the social implications as well as the philosophy behind 9/11 truth:
http://www.911truth.org
and for a partial list of culprits:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNAC
2006-06-10 03:53:49 · answer #2 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Bogus. How can people say the president is such an idiot, yet able to pull of the greatest most complex illusion of all time in total secrecy? He's really cracked down on leakers & they still can't keep anything secret! Anyone that belives this conspiracy is totally nuts!!!
2006-06-10 03:46:57 · answer #3 · answered by djack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do a search for "loose change". I refuse to answer this question again because its already been answered 1,236 times including about 10 by me. Is there a reason why you need to keep asking the same question (24 times by my count)?
2006-06-10 03:50:55 · answer #4 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything in it is true, it is obviously presented in such a way as to present an agenda. Whether you agree with the agenda or not, they are citing facts
2006-06-10 07:07:56 · answer #5 · answered by Caffiend 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will always be more conspiracy theorists than conspiracies.
2006-06-10 04:48:06 · answer #6 · answered by Mike 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, but that is a definite maybe.
2006-06-10 03:37:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
2006-06-10 03:15:58 · answer #8 · answered by YourDreamDoc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-06-10 03:20:11 · answer #9 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BS.
2006-06-10 04:23:01 · answer #10 · answered by ♥fluffybunnyears 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋