GROSS speaking as a Clipped dude i can not imagine having a turtle neck on down there BUT it does make since that you guys have more sensation than us clipped dudes.
DOES IT MATTER, WELL AS LONG AS THE DUDE PULLS BACK AND WASHES AROUND ALL OF THE IMPORTANT AREA I GUESS NOT OTHERWISE URINE DRIPS THERE AFTER BATHROOM AND EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
HAVE A NICE DAY
2006-06-10 02:28:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Scottfree 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. It does not matter in the way of lovemaking. People used to be circumcised because of religious beliefs, but in past decades, centuries, the only reason to be circumcised is because of preferance. The uncircumcised male has a higher risk of an infection (not to include STDs) than a circumcised male.
2006-06-10 09:35:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by jrsenterprises 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Only if bothers performance. I feel the reason people did it in the old days was for a sanitary practice hence; the foreskin would harbor bacteriums and spread vd's - another reason to be circumsized as it can pull skin and cause certain discomfort with acts..if it is done badly tho it also can affect performance. You can tell whe a guy get a bad job with two tones of skin which can cause mental state of not being right, and not to mention ugly.but then again one that is not is scary..I go for get it done tho. and by a qualified dr.who has done many.
2006-06-10 10:23:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by gypsygirl731 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
circumcision should make no difference, some say that sensation is dulled by "it " as the head of the penis is exposed constantly and the "male g spot" becomes a little desensitised.
On the other hand if the 4skin is not cleaned and dried correctly during bathing etc a mild to serious infection, not to mention a foul smell may develope.
Truth is it shouldn`t alter your ability to perform to a
the max whether you`re "done"or not "done"
2006-06-10 09:44:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by passionatecook 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
All I know about that is it is I think a Jewish ritual done when a child is born. If you look in the bible it speaks of circumcision. I've heard that it is not necessary but the best place to find out more about it is on Yahoo! Search.
2006-06-10 09:27:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by LayLay 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have only been with one guy that wasn't cut. It was a little different looking at first but felt the same if you know what I mean ;) So to me it is a non-issue, but I don't have a religious stand on this and others might.
2006-06-10 09:30:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i had a boyfriend once that wasn't and he had lots more feeling down there and it gives you penis more skin to grow into.....i think you penis would be bigger if people were not circumcised.......
2006-06-10 09:50:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by sha.babyblues 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i don't believe so, cause it's still your body and when it comes down to it, it works the same as if it didn't.
2006-06-10 09:28:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by punisher2us 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer unmutilated, they last longer.
2006-06-10 09:24:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
lala
2006-06-10 09:31:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋